Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!


Spring Mt. Bridge Club
12:30 pm ♦ Open Pairs
Saturday, February 21, 2015

Photo Gallery of Winners | ACBLmerge | ACBLscore | Legacy Display

Event: Saturday Afternoon Pairs

Session: Saturday Aft

Movement: MITCHELL

Date: February 21, 2015

Rating: Club Masterpoint

Section: F

Club No: 244830

Club: SPRING MOUNTAIN BRIDGE CL

Dir: Barbara Vasilevs

MP Limits: None/1500/300

Average: 60

Top: 5

Field strength: Mean: 1301 MP
Geomean: 459 MP
(based on 21 players)

Section F    North-South - Pairs in strats: A=6 / B=5 / C=3

Group the Results

 

Section

 

 

Name

Name

Dir

No

Flt

A

B

C

Score

Result

Points

1

Sue Chun

Daryl Sulerud

N-S

2

C

1

1

1

75.50

62.92

0.60

2

Barbara Geil

Don Baltz

N-S

5

C

2

2

-

69.00

57.50

0.42

3

Linda Schanz

Meg Harrington

N-S

4

B

-

-

64.00

53.33

4

Joe Caplan

George Vasilevsky

N-S

3

A

-

63.00

52.50

5

Maria Poh

Donna Fisher

N-S

6

C

-

-

-

44.50

37.08

6

Rosemary Hayden

Marina Marder

N-S

1

B

-

-

44.00

36.67

Section F    East-West - Pairs in strats: A=6 / B=4 / C=2

Group the Results

 

Section

 

 

Name

Name

Dir

No

Flt

A

B

C

Score

Result

Points

1

Barbara Dunkley

Diane Graese

E-W

6

A

1

72.00

60.00

0.60

2

Barbara Mikkelson

Justine Hancock

E-W

1

B

2

1

71.50

59.58

0.42

3

Mel Fineberg

Ernest Ledbetter

E-W

4

A

-

66.00

55.00

4

Jacqueline Harrigan

Judith Ann Gillespie

E-W

2

B

-

2

56.50

47.08

0.22

5

Joyce Burke

Joan Williams

E-W

5

C

-

-

1

51.50

42.92

0.16

6

Monique Achtman

Myron Achtman

E-W

3

C

-

-

-

42.50

35.42

12 pairs - Pairs in strats: A=12 / B=9 / C=5
Click on a result to see the recap for this pair.


You can move from board to board by using the arrow keys on your keyboard.

All Boards

Previous Board

257

258

259

260

261

262

263

264

265

266

267

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

278

279

280

Next Board

257
Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

50

5.00

0.00

5-Geil-Baltz

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

90

4.00

1.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

100

2.50

2.50

6-Poh-Fisher

5-Burke-Williams

 

100

2.50

2.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

110

0.50

4.50

1-Hayden-Marder

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

110

0.50

4.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

258
Dlr: East 
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

50

 

5.00

0.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

100

3.50

1.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

100

3.50

1.50

5-Geil-Baltz

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

120

2.00

3.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

200

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

5-Burke-Williams

 

800

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

259
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

430

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

400

 

2.50

2.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

400

 

2.50

2.50

6-Poh-Fisher

5-Burke-Williams

400

 

2.50

2.50

5-Geil-Baltz

3-Achtman-Achtman

400

 

2.50

2.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

6-Dunkley-Graese

120

 

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

260
Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

120

 

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

120

 

3.00

2.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

120

 

3.00

2.00

5-Geil-Baltz

3-Achtman-Achtman

100

 

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

5-Burke-Williams

 

100

0.00

5.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

6-Dunkley-Graese

261
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

430

4.00

1.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

430

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

430

4.00

1.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

5-Burke-Williams

 

490

1.50

3.50

1-Hayden-Marder

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

490

1.50

3.50

6-Poh-Fisher

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

990

0.00

5.00

5-Geil-Baltz

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

262
Dlr: East 
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

5-Burke-Williams

100

 

3.50

1.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

100

 

3.50

1.50

5-Geil-Baltz

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

90

2.00

3.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

110

0.50

4.50

1-Hayden-Marder

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

110

0.50

4.50

6-Poh-Fisher

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

263
Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

100

 

4.50

0.50

5-Geil-Baltz

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

100

 

4.50

0.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

5-Burke-Williams

 

620

2.00

3.00

1-Hayden-Marder

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

620

2.00

3.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

620

2.00

3.00

6-Poh-Fisher

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

660

0.00

5.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

3-Achtman-Achtman

264
Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

110

5.00

0.00

6-Poh-Fisher

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

120

3.50

1.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

120

3.50

1.50

5-Geil-Baltz

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

130

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

5-Burke-Williams

 

150

1.00

4.00

1-Hayden-Marder

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

180

0.00

5.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

265
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

460

 

5.00

0.00

1-Hayden-Marder

5-Burke-Williams

430

 

3.50

1.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

430

 

3.50

1.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

6-Dunkley-Graese

400

 

1.50

3.50

6-Poh-Fisher

3-Achtman-Achtman

400

 

1.50

3.50

5-Geil-Baltz

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

50

0.00

5.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

266
Dlr: East 
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

660

 

5.00

0.00

6-Poh-Fisher

3-Achtman-Achtman

620

 

2.50

2.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

620

 

2.50

2.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

620

 

2.50

2.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

6-Dunkley-Graese

620

 

2.50

2.50

5-Geil-Baltz

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

170

 

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

5-Burke-Williams

267
Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

170

 

5.00

0.00

6-Poh-Fisher

3-Achtman-Achtman

100

 

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

6-Dunkley-Graese

50

 

3.00

2.00

5-Geil-Baltz

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

50

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

100

1.00

4.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

130

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

5-Burke-Williams

268
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

100

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

50

 

4.00

1.00

5-Geil-Baltz

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

100

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

5-Burke-Williams

 

130

1.50

3.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

130

1.50

3.50

6-Poh-Fisher

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

200

0.00

5.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

6-Dunkley-Graese

269
Dlr: North
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

140

 

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

5-Burke-Williams

100

 

3.00

2.00

6-Poh-Fisher

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

100

1.50

3.50

1-Hayden-Marder

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

100

1.50

3.50

5-Geil-Baltz

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

110

0.00

5.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

3-Achtman-Achtman

270
Dlr: East 
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

50

 

4.50

0.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

3-Achtman-Achtman

50

 

4.50

0.50

5-Geil-Baltz

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

100

2.50

2.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

5-Burke-Williams

 

100

2.50

2.50

6-Poh-Fisher

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

110

0.50

4.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

110

0.50

4.50

1-Hayden-Marder

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

271
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

140

 

5.00

0.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

5-Burke-Williams

110

 

4.00

1.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

100

2.00

3.00

1-Hayden-Marder

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

100

2.00

3.00

6-Poh-Fisher

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

100

2.00

3.00

5-Geil-Baltz

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

300

0.00

5.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

272
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

510

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

400

 

4.00

1.00

5-Geil-Baltz

6-Dunkley-Graese

200

 

3.00

2.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

5-Burke-Williams

100

 

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

50

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

110

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

273
Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

520

4.00

1.00

5-Geil-Baltz

5-Burke-Williams

 

520

4.00

1.00

1-Hayden-Marder

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

520

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

1020

1.00

4.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

1020

1.00

4.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

1020

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

274
Dlr: East 
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

660

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

6-Dunkley-Graese

620

 

4.00

1.00

5-Geil-Baltz

5-Burke-Williams

600

 

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

600

 

2.00

3.00

1-Hayden-Marder

3-Achtman-Achtman

600

 

2.00

3.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

150

 

0.00

5.00

6-Poh-Fisher

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

275
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

400

 

4.50

0.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

400

 

4.50

0.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

100

 

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

50

2.00

3.00

6-Poh-Fisher

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

150

0.50

4.50

5-Geil-Baltz

5-Burke-Williams

 

150

0.50

4.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

6-Dunkley-Graese

276
Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

600

5.00

0.00

5-Geil-Baltz

5-Burke-Williams

 

690

3.00

2.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

690

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

690

3.00

2.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

1370

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

1430

0.00

5.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

6-Dunkley-Graese

277
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

50

 

4.50

0.50

5-Geil-Baltz

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

50

 

4.50

0.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

110

3.00

2.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

5-Burke-Williams

 

130

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

130

1.00

4.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

130

1.00

4.00

1-Hayden-Marder

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

278
Dlr: East 
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

150

4.00

1.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

150

4.00

1.00

1-Hayden-Marder

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

150

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

600

2.00

3.00

5-Geil-Baltz

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

630

0.50

4.50

6-Poh-Fisher

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

630

0.50

4.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

5-Burke-Williams

279
Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

3-Achtman-Achtman

100

 

3.50

1.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

5-Burke-Williams

100

 

3.50

1.50

1-Hayden-Marder

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

600

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

630

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

660

0.00

5.00

5-Geil-Baltz

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

280
Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

430

 

5.00

0.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

3-Achtman-Achtman

400

 

3.00

2.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

400

 

3.00

2.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

5-Burke-Williams

400

 

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

2-Harrigan-Gillespie

 

50

0.50

4.50

6-Poh-Fisher

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

50

0.50

4.50

5-Geil-Baltz

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter