N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
    PASS       2.00   0.00  Pass Out      2-Randall-Randall vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        130    1.00   1.00  4♣ W 4    ♠K  6-Little-Wooden vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
        150    0.00   2.00  3♣ W 5    ♠2  3-Peters-Francis vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        460    2.00   0.00  3N E 5    ♠3  3-Peters-Francis vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
        490    1.00   1.00  3N E 6    ♠3  2-Randall-Randall vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        520    0.00   2.00  3N E 7    ♥3  6-Little-Wooden vs 1-Petersen-Reiser

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         90    2.00   0.00  1♦ W 2    ♥6  2-Randall-Randall vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        120    1.00   1.00  2N W 2    ♠2  6-Little-Wooden vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
        600    0.00   2.00  3N W 3    ♦Q  3-Peters-Francis vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  3♠ E -1   ♦A  3-Peters-Francis vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
        110    0.50   1.50  2♠ E 2    ♦A  2-Randall-Randall vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        110    0.50   1.50  1♠ E 2    ♦K  6-Little-Wooden vs 1-Petersen-Reiser

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    2.00   0.00  3♠ E 3    ♦Q  6-Little-Wooden vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
        420    0.50   1.50  4♠ E 4    ♦Q  2-Randall-Randall vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        420    0.50   1.50  4♠ E 4    ♦Q  3-Peters-Francis vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          2.00   0.00  1N N 2    ♥2  3-Peters-Francis vs 4-Robertson-Favors
         50    0.50   1.50  1N N -1   ♠J  6-Little-Wooden vs 2-Randall-Randall
         50    0.50   1.50  3♠ S -1   ♥J  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Petersen-Reiser

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          2.00   0.00  2♣ N 4    ♥J  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
  100          1.00   1.00  1♠ E -1   ♣K  3-Peters-Francis vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        140    0.00   2.00  1♠ E 3    ♦3  6-Little-Wooden vs 2-Randall-Randall

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    2.00   0.00  4♣ W 4    ♣6  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
        480    0.50   1.50  4♥ W 6    ♦T  6-Little-Wooden vs 2-Randall-Randall
        480    0.50   1.50  4♥ E 6    ♣7  3-Peters-Francis vs 4-Robertson-Favors

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    1.50   0.50  3♠ E 4    ♥7  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
        170    1.50   0.50  1♠ E 4    ♣T  3-Peters-Francis vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        620    0.00   2.00  4♠ E 4    ♦2  6-Little-Wooden vs 2-Randall-Randall

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          1.00   1.00  4♥ S 5    ♦A  3-Peters-Francis vs 4-Robertson-Favors
  650          1.00   1.00  4♥ S 5    ♦6  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
  650          1.00   1.00  4♥ N 5    ♦A  6-Little-Wooden vs 2-Randall-Randall

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  980          2.00   0.00  6♠ S 6    ♦K  4-Robertson-Favors vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
  510          1.00   1.00  4♠ S 7    ♦A  6-Little-Wooden vs 3-Peters-Francis
  480          0.00   2.00  5♠ S 6    ♦A  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 2-Randall-Randall

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          1.75   0.25  4♦ W -1   ♠Q  4-Robertson-Favors vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
  AVE-  AVE+   0.80   1.20  4♥ E -2   ♣A  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 2-Randall-Randall
        100    0.25   1.75  4♠ S -1   ♣T  6-Little-Wooden vs 3-Peters-Francis

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        200    2.00   0.00  2♠ E 5    ♣2  4-Robertson-Favors vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
        620    1.00   1.00  4♠ E 4    ♣2  6-Little-Wooden vs 3-Peters-Francis
        630    0.00   2.00  3N W 4    ♥3  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 2-Randall-Randall

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  490          2.00   0.00  3N S 6    ♣9  6-Little-Wooden vs 3-Peters-Francis
         50    1.00   1.00  5♠ S -1   ♣A  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 2-Randall-Randall
        100    0.00   2.00  4♠ S -2   ♥7  4-Robertson-Favors vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    2.00   0.00  2♦ E 4    ♥J  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 2-Randall-Randall
        460    1.00   1.00  3N W 5    ♠3  4-Robertson-Favors vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
        490    0.00   2.00  3N W 6    ♠3  6-Little-Wooden vs 3-Peters-Francis

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         90    2.00   0.00  1♣ W 2    ♦K  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 3-Peters-Francis
        140    1.00   1.00  2♠ W 3    ♠3  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 2-Randall-Randall
        150    0.00   2.00  1N W 3    ♦7  6-Little-Wooden vs 4-Robertson-Favors

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         80    2.00   0.00  1♠ E 1    ♦K  6-Little-Wooden vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        100    1.00   1.00  2♥ N -2   ♦T  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 2-Randall-Randall
        110    0.00   2.00  3♦ W 3    ♥6  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 3-Peters-Francis

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  2♠ S 2    ♣Q  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 2-Randall-Randall
   80          1.00   1.00  1♠ S 1    ♦A  6-Little-Wooden vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        200    0.00   2.00  2♠ S -2   ♣Q  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 3-Peters-Francis

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          2.00   0.00  3N S 4    ♥5  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 2-Randall-Randall
  150          1.00   1.00  4♣ S 5    ♥Q  6-Little-Wooden vs 4-Robertson-Favors
         50    0.00   2.00  5♣ S -1   ♦3  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 3-Peters-Francis

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.00   0.00  2♥ N 2    ♦4  1-Petersen-Reiser vs 3-Peters-Francis
        100    1.00   1.00  2N N -1   ♣2  6-Little-Wooden vs 4-Robertson-Favors
        300    0.00   2.00  4♠ S -3   ♦2  5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 2-Randall-Randall

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          2.00   0.00  2♦ N 4    ♠8  4-Robertson-Favors vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
   90          1.00   1.00  1N N 1    ♣5  2-Randall-Randall vs 3-Peters-Francis
        200    0.00   2.00  5♥ N -2   ♠5  6-Little-Wooden vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  1N W -1   ♦4  6-Little-Wooden vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
         50    0.50   1.50  5♦ N -1   ♥J  2-Randall-Randall vs 3-Peters-Francis
         50    0.50   1.50  4♦ N -1   ♣K  4-Robertson-Favors vs 1-Petersen-Reiser

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   0.00  5♦ E -2   ♣A  6-Little-Wooden vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
        110    1.00   1.00  3♦ E 3    ♥8  4-Robertson-Favors vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
        600    0.00   2.00  3N W 3    ♦Q  2-Randall-Randall vs 3-Peters-Francis

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          1.50   0.50  2♠ S 3    ♥8  2-Randall-Randall vs 3-Peters-Francis
  140          1.50   0.50  2♠ S 3    ♣5  4-Robertson-Favors vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
        100    0.00   2.00  2N S -2   ♣5  6-Little-Wooden vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.00   0.00  5♥ W -1   ♦A  2-Randall-Randall vs 3-Peters-Francis
        130    1.00   1.00  3♣ E 4    ♦8  4-Robertson-Favors vs 1-Petersen-Reiser
        170    0.00   2.00  3♥ W 4    ♣8  6-Little-Wooden vs 5-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren