| 1 |
♠T75
♥853
♦Q943
♣T87
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦5/6 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT5/6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3/2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 1N W -1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 4-Schechter-Martin
90 4.00 1.00 1N W 1 4-Casson-Nelson vs 6-Cook-Cook
100 3.00 2.00 2N S -2 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
120 2.00 3.00 1N W 2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 2-Landau-Ahern
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ W 3 5-Munday-Munday vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
200 0.00 5.00 2N S -4 6-Belton-Skinner vs 5-Grant-Lane
|
| 2 |
♠96
♥T5
♦JT965
♣Q643
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2/1♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ W 3 4-Casson-Nelson vs 6-Cook-Cook
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ E 3 5-Munday-Munday vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
140 2.50 2.50 2♠ E 3 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 4-Schechter-Martin
140 2.50 2.50 2♠ E 3 6-Belton-Skinner vs 5-Grant-Lane
170 0.00 5.00 2♠ E 4 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 2-Landau-Ahern
|
| 3 |
♠AQJ943
♥JT6
♦T
♣965
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣3/4 ♦5/6 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
50 4.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 4-Schechter-Martin
50 4.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 6-Belton-Skinner vs 5-Grant-Lane
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 4-Casson-Nelson vs 6-Cook-Cook
100 1.50 3.50 3♠ N -2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 2-Landau-Ahern
300 0.00 5.00 4♠* N -2 5-Munday-Munday vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
|
| 4 |
♠J85
♥8762
♦Q5
♣AQ97
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 5.00 0.00 2N E 2 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 4-Casson-Nelson vs 6-Cook-Cook
180 1.50 3.50 2N E 4 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 2-Landau-Ahern
180 1.50 3.50 2N E 4 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 4-Schechter-Martin
180 1.50 3.50 2N E 4 5-Munday-Munday vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
180 1.50 3.50 2N E 4 6-Belton-Skinner vs 5-Grant-Lane
|
| 5 |
♠K53
♥A642
♦Q62
♣Q42
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/-♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣7/6 |
| EW: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 5.00 0.00 3♦* E -2 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
100 4.00 1.00 3♦ E -2 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 6-Cook-Cook
90 3.00 2.00 2♣ E 2 5-Munday-Munday vs 2-Landau-Ahern
100 1.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
100 1.50 3.50 2♦ S -1 4-Casson-Nelson vs 5-Grant-Lane
300 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -3 6-Belton-Skinner vs 4-Schechter-Martin
|
| 6 |
♠KQ84
♥8
♦T9643
♣KJ7
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 6♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 6-Cook-Cook
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 4-Casson-Nelson vs 5-Grant-Lane
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 6-Belton-Skinner vs 4-Schechter-Martin
230 1.00 4.00 3♠ S 6 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
200 0.00 5.00 2♠ S 5 5-Munday-Munday vs 2-Landau-Ahern
|
| 7 |
♠KQ
♥QT87652
♦-
♣AT94
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 4♠ S -4 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 6-Cook-Cook
500 4.00 1.00 3♥* N -2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
600 3.00 2.00 5♦ W 5 5-Munday-Munday vs 2-Landau-Ahern
630 1.00 4.00 3N E 4 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
630 1.00 4.00 3N E 4 4-Casson-Nelson vs 5-Grant-Lane
630 1.00 4.00 3N E 4 6-Belton-Skinner vs 4-Schechter-Martin
|
| 8 |
♠AJT976
♥J
♦KJ6543
♣-
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♦ 6/5♠ ♣1 ♥2 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♥ ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 4-Casson-Nelson vs 5-Grant-Lane
50 2.00 3.00 6♥ E -1 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 6-Cook-Cook
450 1.00 4.00 4♥ E 5 6-Belton-Skinner vs 4-Schechter-Martin
480 0.00 5.00 5♥ E 6 5-Munday-Munday vs 2-Landau-Ahern
|
| 9 |
♠T52
♥AKT72
♦T83
♣52
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 4/5♠ 2/4NT ♣4 ♥6 |
| EW: 3/2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 4-Casson-Nelson vs 4-Schechter-Martin
450 4.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 5-Munday-Munday vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 4 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 5-Grant-Lane
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 4 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 2-Landau-Ahern
200 1.00 4.00 5♣ E -2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 6-Cook-Cook
50 0.00 5.00 5♠ S -1 6-Belton-Skinner vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
|
| 10 |
♠Q
♥QT875
♦K6
♣KJT74
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2/1♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 4-Casson-Nelson vs 4-Schechter-Martin
620 4.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 5-Grant-Lane
140 3.00 2.00 3♥ S 3 5-Munday-Munday vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ E -1 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 6-Cook-Cook
100 0.50 4.50 3N S -1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 2-Landau-Ahern
100 0.50 4.50 3N S -1 6-Belton-Skinner vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
|
| 11 |
♠AK975
♥AT2
♦KJ2
♣72
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6/5 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 4♥* E -1 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 6-Cook-Cook
50 4.00 1.00 4♣ S -1 4-Casson-Nelson vs 4-Schechter-Martin
200 3.00 2.00 3N N -4 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 5-Grant-Lane
250 2.00 3.00 3N N -5 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 2-Landau-Ahern
300 1.00 4.00 5♣* S -2 5-Munday-Munday vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
500 0.00 5.00 4♠* S -3 6-Belton-Skinner vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
|
| 12 |
♠Q4
♥A52
♦T3
♣AK9653
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♥ 1♠ 5NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.30 0.70 3N S 5 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 2-Landau-Ahern
660 4.30 0.70 3N S 5 5-Munday-Munday vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
630 2.50 2.50 3N S 4 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 5-Grant-Lane
600 1.30 3.70 3N S 3 4-Casson-Nelson vs 4-Schechter-Martin
100 0.10 4.90 4♥ S -1 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 6-Cook-Cook
|
| 13 |
♠T7
♥K764
♦J83
♣AJ65
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5/6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 5.00 0.00 1N N 2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 5-Grant-Lane
110 4.00 1.00 2♠ S 2 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 4-Schechter-Martin
100 3.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 4-Casson-Nelson vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
90 2.00 3.00 1N E 1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
120 1.00 4.00 1N E 2 6-Belton-Skinner vs 2-Landau-Ahern
140 0.00 5.00 2♥ E 3 5-Munday-Munday vs 6-Cook-Cook
|
| 14 |
♠A72
♥A94
♦Q986
♣T63
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5/4 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ E 2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 5-Grant-Lane
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ E 2 6-Belton-Skinner vs 2-Landau-Ahern
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ E 3 5-Munday-Munday vs 6-Cook-Cook
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ E 3 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 4-Schechter-Martin
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ E 3 4-Casson-Nelson vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
|
| 15 |
♠Q7
♥764
♦K853
♣T852
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3/2♦ 2♥ 3/2♠ 3/2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
80 4.50 0.50 1♠ W 1 4-Casson-Nelson vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
80 4.50 0.50 1♥ E 1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
90 2.00 3.00 1N E 1 6-Belton-Skinner vs 2-Landau-Ahern
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ E 2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 5-Grant-Lane
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ E 2 5-Munday-Munday vs 6-Cook-Cook
120 0.00 5.00 2N E 2 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 4-Schechter-Martin
|
| 16 |
♠AQ7
♥A962
♦A72
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1/-♠ 3NT
♠7/6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦3/4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 5-Grant-Lane
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 4-Casson-Nelson vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 4-Schechter-Martin
50 0.50 4.50 3N N -1 5-Munday-Munday vs 6-Cook-Cook
50 0.50 4.50 3N N -1 6-Belton-Skinner vs 2-Landau-Ahern
|
| 17 |
♠KJT97
♥KQJ
♦632
♣K5
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♥ 5♠ ♦5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 5.00 0.00 4♠ N 6 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 6-Cook-Cook
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
230 3.00 2.00 3♠ N 6 6-Belton-Skinner vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
200 1.50 3.50 3♠ N 5 4-Casson-Nelson vs 2-Landau-Ahern
200 1.50 3.50 2♠ N 5 5-Munday-Munday vs 5-Grant-Lane
170 0.00 5.00 3♠ N 4 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 4-Schechter-Martin
|
| 18 |
♠86
♥A652
♦KQT42
♣K5
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ 3/2♥ 1NT
♣5 ♦7/6 ♠3 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ W 4 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ W 4 5-Munday-Munday vs 5-Grant-Lane
200 3.00 2.00 3♠ W 5 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 4-Schechter-Martin
420 1.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 6-Cook-Cook
420 1.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 4-Casson-Nelson vs 2-Landau-Ahern
420 1.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 6-Belton-Skinner vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
|
| 19 |
♠652
♥Q9632
♦Q83
♣A8
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 3N E -4 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 6-Belton-Skinner vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
100 3.00 2.00 5♣ E -1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 6-Cook-Cook
130 1.50 3.50 4♣ W 4 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 4-Schechter-Martin
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ W 4 5-Munday-Munday vs 5-Grant-Lane
500 0.00 5.00 5♦* S -3 4-Casson-Nelson vs 2-Landau-Ahern
|
| 20 |
♠864
♥Q64
♦QT8532
♣9
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 6♠ W -2 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 6-Cook-Cook
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 4-Schechter-Martin
650 1.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 4-Casson-Nelson vs 2-Landau-Ahern
650 1.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 5-Munday-Munday vs 5-Grant-Lane
650 1.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 6-Belton-Skinner vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
|
| 21 |
♠72
♥KQJT7
♦K3
♣Q875
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4/5 ♦4/5 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 5.00 0.00 1N N 2 5-Munday-Munday vs 4-Schechter-Martin
100 3.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 5-Grant-Lane
100 3.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 4-Casson-Nelson vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ E 2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
200 0.50 4.50 3♥ N -2 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 2-Landau-Ahern
200 0.50 4.50 3♥ N -2 6-Belton-Skinner vs 6-Cook-Cook
|
| 22 |
♠QJT7
♥T85
♦Q4
♣AJ83
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♠6/7 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 6-Belton-Skinner vs 6-Cook-Cook
100 3.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
100 3.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 5-Grant-Lane
100 3.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 5-Munday-Munday vs 4-Schechter-Martin
50 0.50 4.50 2N N -1 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 2-Landau-Ahern
50 0.50 4.50 2♦ S -1 4-Casson-Nelson vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
|
| 23 |
♠AT83
♥43
♦T98754
♣2
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
100 3.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 5-Munday-Munday vs 4-Schechter-Martin
100 3.50 1.50 5♣ E -1 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 2-Landau-Ahern
130 2.00 3.00 3♣ E 4 4-Casson-Nelson vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
150 0.50 4.50 3♣ E 5 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 5-Grant-Lane
150 0.50 4.50 3♣ E 5 6-Belton-Skinner vs 6-Cook-Cook
|
| 24 |
♠QT9
♥KJ9
♦K3
♣AKT83
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 4♠* W -1 6-Belton-Skinner vs 6-Cook-Cook
50 3.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 5-Munday-Munday vs 4-Schechter-Martin
50 3.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 3-Aiken-Wilson vs 5-Grant-Lane
50 1.50 3.50 2N N -1 1-Humphreys-Tracey vs 2-Landau-Ahern
50 1.50 3.50 4♣ N -1 4-Casson-Nelson vs 1-Bredall-Hegarty
100 0.00 5.00 3♦ N -2 2-Landwehr-Clayton vs 3-Cohen-Douglass
|