| 1 |
♠84
♥K
♦T87654
♣J654
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
| EW: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 2.00 0.00 2N W 4 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
400 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 1-Back-Kalman vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
400 0.50 1.50 5♣ W 5 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
|
| 2 |
♠A76
♥KQ65432
♦3
♣72
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 1.50 0.50 3N S 3 1-Back-Kalman vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
600 1.50 0.50 3N S 3 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
50 0.00 2.00 2N E -1 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 3 |
♠A654
♥AK2
♦Q83
♣843
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ S 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
50 1.00 1.00 5♣ S -1 1-Back-Kalman vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 4 |
♠-
♥AK975
♦K9852
♣A95
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ -/1♦ -/1NT
♦6/7 ♥4 ♠3 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ E 4 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
200 0.50 1.50 3♥ N -2 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
200 0.50 1.50 3♣* S -1 1-Back-Kalman vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
|
| 5 |
♠A72
♥AJ8653
♦AQ9
♣8
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2/3♠ 2NT ♣4/6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 1.75 0.25 1N W 3 1-Back-Kalman vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
430 0.25 1.75 3N E 4 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 6 |
♠AQJ8
♥Q92
♦A9643
♣7
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4/3♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4/5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 6♠ W -1 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 1-Back-Kalman vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
| 7 |
♠3
♥KT976
♦A
♣JT7654
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 1-Back-Kalman vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
200 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -2 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
| 8 |
♠QT2
♥J75
♦KJ7
♣QT32
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 1-Back-Kalman vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
90 1.00 1.00 1♦ N 2 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
130 0.00 2.00 2♣ W 4 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
|
| 9 |
♠KJ75
♥J875
♦QJT93
♣-
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ N -2 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
120 1.00 1.00 2N W 2 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
180 0.00 2.00 2N W 4 1-Back-Kalman vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
|
| 10 |
♠T542
♥K73
♦J95
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.75 0.25 2♠ N 2 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 0.25 1.75 2N W -1 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
|
| 11 |
♠93
♥KQ
♦98532
♣AQJ7
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 1N S 3 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
110 1.00 1.00 2♣ S 3 1-Back-Kalman vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
90 0.00 2.00 2♣ S 2 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
|
| 12 |
♠Q3
♥JT6
♦K76
♣J7654
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6/5 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♥ 5♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 2♣ E -1 1-Back-Kalman vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ W 3 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
300 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -3 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
|
| 13 |
♠T8
♥K95
♦K962
♣J984
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ S 3 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
70 0.00 2.00 1♣ N 1 1-Back-Kalman vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
| 14 |
♠KJ984
♥JT
♦52
♣K862
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 1.50 0.50 1N S 4 1-Back-Kalman vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
180 1.50 0.50 1N S 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
90 0.00 2.00 1N S 1 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
|
| 15 |
♠Q853
♥J9765
♦Q
♣J73
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 1-Back-Kalman vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
600 1.00 1.00 3N N 3 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
120 0.00 2.00 2N N 2 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Walker-Prendergast
|
| 16 |
♠AJ932
♥Q3
♦5
♣AKJ94
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♣ 5♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
| EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.50 0.50 3N N 3 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
400 1.50 0.50 3N N 3 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
170 0.00 2.00 1♠ S 4 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 17 |
♠QJT
♥K753
♦A95
♣T85
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-NT
♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT7/6 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ N -1 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ N -1 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ E 3 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 18 |
♠T73
♥Q4
♦AT3
♣AKJ43
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ -/1♠
♣4 ♦1 ♠6/7 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ E 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
400 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
400 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
|
| 19 |
♠J5
♥KT4
♦KT43
♣J763
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6/5 |
| EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 0.00 3N W 3 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 4-Rasmussen-Daigneault vs 4-Jacobson-Samuels
|
| 20 |
♠J
♥AK9
♦JT865
♣5432
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
|