| 1 |
♠KQT
♥A4
♦QJ93
♣T932
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ E 5 ♥J 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ E 5 ♦4 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 1-Burns-Jones
480 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 6 ♦8 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
|
| 2 |
♠QT9
♥A4
♦AQ76543
♣2
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N S 3 ♥J 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 1-Burns-Jones
130 1.00 1.00 2♦ N 4 ♠K 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
100 0.00 2.00 2N E -2 ♦9 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
|
| 3 |
♠T97
♥JT963
♦K8
♣J42
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N E 4 ♦6 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
660 0.50 1.50 3N W 5 ♥J 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 1-Burns-Jones
660 0.50 1.50 3N W 5 ♥J 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
|
| 4 |
♠AT6
♥J754
♦AJT86
♣4
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ S 4 ♥6 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♦3 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
200 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♣8 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 1-Burns-Jones
|
| 5 |
♠K75
♥6
♦AJ52
♣AQJ75
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 ♦7 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 1-Burns-Jones
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 ♦7 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 ♣K 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
|
| 6 |
♠A74
♥JT8653
♦Q3
♣K7
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 1♥ N 4 ♦A 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 1-Burns-Jones
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ N 3 ♣5 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ N 3 ♣5 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
|
| 7 |
♠9
♥QT643
♦QJ65
♣K74
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6/5 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 ♦4 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 1-Burns-Jones
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ S 2 ♠6 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♥A 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
|
| 8 |
♠J8
♥875
♦Q65
♣97653
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♠ E 6 ♣Q 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 1-Burns-Jones
490 1.00 1.00 3N E 6 ♦8 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
510 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 7 ♦T 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
|
| 9 |
♠J2
♥JT62
♦AJ5
♣KQ98
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 ♦8 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ N 4 ♦8 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 1-Burns-Jones
100 0.00 2.00 2N S -2 ♠7 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
|
| 10 |
♠Q87
♥T53
♦J72
♣T986
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♦3 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
90 1.00 1.00 1N E 1 ♦5 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ E 3 ♣5 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 1-Burns-Jones
|
| 11 |
♠QT843
♥54
♦K7
♣KT87
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥1 NT1 |
| EW: 2♦ 5♥ 5NT ♣5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ E 5 ♠2 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ E 5 ♦2 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 1-Burns-Jones
980 0.00 2.00 6♥ E 6 ♠K 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 12 |
♠T95
♥JT75
♦J85
♣QT6
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 ♦6 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
140 1.50 0.50 1♠ S 3 ♣3 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 1-Burns-Jones
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ S 2 ♣9 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
|
| 13 |
♠32
♥Q964
♦JT
♣KQ972
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 1♠ E 4 ♥8 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 1-Burns-Jones
200 0.50 1.50 3N S -2 ♣A 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
200 0.50 1.50 2♦ S -2 ♠J 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 14 |
♠92
♥AJ876
♦AJ54
♣53
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.50 0.50 3N N 3 ♦2 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
400 1.50 0.50 3N N 3 ♦2 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 1-Burns-Jones
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ S 3 ♦7 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 15 |
♠K97
♥AQJ32
♦A95
♣AT
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5/4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 5/4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 7 ♠2 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 1-Burns-Jones
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 ♦Q 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 ♣A 1-Gerber-Mindel vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
|
| 16 |
♠42
♥Q5
♦AK52
♣Q6542
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 4♣ S 4 ♠5 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
PASS 0.50 1.50 Pass Out 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
PASS 0.50 1.50 Pass Out 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
|
| 17 |
♠KJ942
♥JT83
♦K
♣J64
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 ♥J 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ S -2 ♥A 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
130 0.00 2.00 4♦ E 4 ♠6 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 18 |
♠AT
♥J863
♦98
♣J9876
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ -/1NT
♠4/5 NT6/7 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5/4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ S 3 ♠J 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ S -1 ♠7 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ S -1 ♠6 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 19 |
♠A7
♥Q5432
♦AJ94
♣AT
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3/4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N N 1 ♠4 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 3 ♥J 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 4 ♣Q 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
|
| 20 |
♠T6542
♥A7
♦AK63
♣AK
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ N 3 ♥T 2-Baker-Rasmussen vs 3-Beckvall-Fisher
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♣A 4-Tooley-Dukes vs 4-Loeb-Eppers
200 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♥9 3-Braunstein-Barber vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
|