1 |
♠Q32
♥KQ3
♦A52
♣KQ84
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K987
♥JT8654
♦93
♣6
|
♠A
♥-
♦KQJT876
♣JT753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5/4 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.00 0.00 5♠ N -1 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
300 1.00 0.00 5♦* E -2 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
300 1.00 0.00 4♦* E -2 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
500 0.50 0.00 5♦* E -3 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
500 0.50 0.00 5♦* E -3 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
100 0.00 0.00 3N N -2 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
400 0.00 0.00 5♦ E 5 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
130 0.00 0.00 4♦ E 4 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
|
2 |
♠K73
♥932
♦863
♣KJ76
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJT954
♥AJ8
♦AQ4
♣3
|
♠A86
♥T7
♦KJT52
♣T98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 6♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 1.00 0.00 3♠ W 6 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
200 1.00 0.00 3♠ W 5 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
480 0.50 0.00 4♠ W 6 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
480 0.50 0.00 4♠ W 6 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
480 0.50 0.00 4♠ W 6 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
480 0.50 0.00 4♠ W 6 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
830 0.00 0.00 3♠* W 6 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
500 0.00 0.00 4♥* S -2 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
|
3 |
♠A542
♥98
♦T85
♣KJ76
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T83
♥AJ
♦Q32
♣QT832
|
♠QJ96
♥Q753
♦KJ7
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 1.00 0.00 1N W 1 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
90 1.00 0.00 1N W 1 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
50 1.00 0.00 2♥ S -1 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
90 1.00 0.00 2♦ S 2 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
150 0.00 0.00 2N W 3 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
120 0.00 0.00 2N E 2 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
120 0.00 0.00 1N W 2 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
120 0.00 0.00 1N W 2 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
|
4 |
♠AJT753
♥KQ
♦AQ64
♣5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠-
♥T7
♦KJ52
♣AJT9876
|
♠KQ62
♥A8643
♦T
♣K32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 2-Larson-Larson
200 1.00 0.00 3♠ N -2 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
300 1.00 0.00 3♠ N -3 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
100 1.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
1400 0.00 0.00 5♠* N -5 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
200 0.00 0.00 4♠ N -2 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
1100 0.00 0.00 4♠* N -4 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
150 0.00 0.00 4♣ W 5 2-Larson-Larson vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
|
5 |
♠K98432
♥K97
♦QJ
♣J8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQJ
♥AQT8
♦932
♣Q92
|
♠76
♥6
♦A8754
♣K6543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥5/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 0.00 1N W -2 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
100 1.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 2-Larson-Larson
150 1.00 0.00 3♣ W -3 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
100 0.50 0.00 3N W -2 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
100 0.50 0.00 3♣ E -2 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
120 0.00 0.00 1N W 2 2-Larson-Larson vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
90 0.00 0.00 1N W 1 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
200 0.00 0.00 2♠ N -2 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
|
6 |
♠AKQ3
♥4
♦QJ64
♣AT85
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠87642
♥T
♦T75
♣QJ73
|
♠J5
♥QJ763
♦A92
♣642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 1.00 0.00 3N N 5 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 2-Larson-Larson
430 1.00 0.00 3N N 4 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
460 1.00 0.00 3N N 5 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
460 1.00 0.00 3N N 5 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
400 0.00 0.00 3N N 3 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
400 0.00 0.00 3N N 3 2-Larson-Larson vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
430 0.00 0.00 3N N 4 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
430 0.00 0.00 3N N 4 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
|
7 |
♠KT982
♥4
♦K8
♣KQJ92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A43
♥AQ96
♦QT6
♣754
|
♠J6
♥T8732
♦J52
♣T86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 5♠ 2/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 1.00 0.00 3N S 5 2-Larson-Larson vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
660 1.00 0.00 3N S 5 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
660 1.00 0.00 3N S 5 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
650 1.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
620 0.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
650 0.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
620 0.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 2-Larson-Larson
620 0.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
|
8 |
♠3
♥AT75
♦AKT86
♣Q62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠QT6
♥Q432
♦J42
♣K75
|
♠AJ97542
♥J98
♦-
♣984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.00 0.00 3N S 3 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
430 1.00 0.00 3N S 4 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
400 1.00 0.00 5♦ N 5 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
400 1.00 0.00 5♦ N 5 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 2-Larson-Larson
300 0.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
100 0.00 0.00 3♠* E -1 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
150 0.00 0.00 4♦ N 5 2-Larson-Larson vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
150 0.00 0.00 3♦ N 5 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
|
9 |
♠J94
♥432
♦A6
♣AQT85
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A87
♥KT98
♦T83
♣943
|
♠K632
♥6
♦QJ742
♣K76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.00 0.00 1N N -1 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
50 1.00 0.00 3♥ S -1 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
100 0.50 0.00 4♥ S -2 2-Larson-Larson vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
100 0.50 0.00 4♥ S -2 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 2-Larson-Larson
110 0.50 0.00 2♥ S 2 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
110 0.50 0.00 2♥ S 2 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
100 0.00 0.00 4♥ S -2 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
100 0.00 0.00 3♥ S -2 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
|
10 |
♠K
♥QJ765
♦KQ74
♣K54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ
♥A43
♦AT952
♣Q72
|
♠Q962
♥KT982
♦6
♣J86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦7/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 1.00 0.00 2N N 4 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
200 1.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 2-Larson-Larson vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
110 1.00 0.00 2♥ E 2 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
500 1.00 0.00 3♦ W -5 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
100 0.00 0.00 2N N -1 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
300 0.00 0.00 3♥ N -3 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 2-Larson-Larson
300 0.00 0.00 3♦ N -3 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
400 0.00 0.00 3♣ S -4 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
|
11 |
♠K72
♥KQJ5
♦QT43
♣83
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T943
♥A973
♦A872
♣6
|
♠J5
♥T42
♦KJ
♣KQT952
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6/5 |
EW: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 1.00 0.00 2N N 4 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
110 1.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
100 1.00 0.00 3♣ E -2 2-Larson-Larson vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
300 1.00 0.00 3♣* E -2 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
50 0.00 0.00 3N S -1 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
50 0.00 0.00 2N S -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
50 0.00 0.00 2N N -1 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 2-Larson-Larson
PASS 0.00 0.00 Pass Out 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
|
12 |
♠T5
♥KJ
♦T76
♣AK9632
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQ764
♥A96
♦Q532
♣5
|
♠J83
♥32
♦A984
♣JT74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
620 1.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
100 1.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 2-Larson-Larson
100 1.00 0.00 4♥ N -1 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
50 0.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
140 0.00 0.00 3♠ W 3 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
140 0.00 0.00 3♠ W 3 2-Larson-Larson vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
100 0.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
|
13 |
♠AK6
♥QT52
♦86
♣A532
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT9543
♥K6
♦K743
♣9
|
♠82
♥A984
♦AQ2
♣KQ74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6/5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
620 0.50 0.00 4♠ E 4 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 2-Larson-Larson
620 0.50 0.00 4♠ E 4 2-Larson-Larson vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
620 0.50 0.00 4♠ E 4 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
620 0.50 0.00 4♠ E 4 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
620 0.50 0.00 4♠ E 4 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
620 0.50 0.00 4♠ E 4 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
170 0.00 0.00 3♠ E 4 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
|
14 |
♠AK86
♥QJT
♦AK63
♣KQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠T742
♥76
♦75
♣AJT62
|
♠QJ953
♥K52
♦QT4
♣93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 1.00 0.00 3N N 5 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
450 1.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
450 1.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
450 0.50 0.00 4♥ N 5 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 2-Larson-Larson
450 0.50 0.00 4♥ N 5 2-Larson-Larson vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
430 0.00 0.00 3N N 4 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
450 0.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
420 0.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
|
15 |
♠T73
♥J5
♦AQ853
♣K74
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠95
♥732
♦976
♣AT985
|
♠KQ862
♥KQ
♦KJ42
♣J3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3/2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
620 1.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
140 1.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 2-Larson-Larson vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
170 1.00 0.00 3♥ S 4 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
200 0.00 0.00 4♥ S -2 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 2-Larson-Larson
200 0.00 0.00 4♥ S -2 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
100 0.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
100 0.00 0.00 3♥ S -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
|
16 |
♠T62
♥QJT4
♦T432
♣JT
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q85
♥8753
♦AK
♣Q976
|
♠AK94
♥K
♦QJ865
♣542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.00 0.00 3N W -2 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
90 1.00 0.00 1N W 1 2-Larson-Larson vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
200 1.00 0.00 1N E -2 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
50 1.00 0.00 2♥ S -1 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
100 0.00 0.00 2N W -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
150 0.00 0.00 1N E 3 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
110 0.00 0.00 2♦ E 3 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 2-Larson-Larson
1100 0.00 0.00 2♣* S -5 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
|
17 |
♠76543
♥T532
♦J
♣J83
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ982
♥AK
♦875
♣Q94
|
♠J
♥J986
♦Q432
♣AKT2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ 3/2♠ 2NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.00 0.00 3N E -1 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
120 1.00 0.00 1N E 2 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
50 1.00 0.00 3♣ E -1 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 2-Larson-Larson
120 0.50 0.00 1N E 2 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
120 0.50 0.00 1N E 2 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
180 0.00 0.00 1N E 4 2-Larson-Larson vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
90 0.00 0.00 1N E 1 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
140 0.00 0.00 2♠ W 3 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
|
18 |
♠J532
♥QJ86
♦KJ92
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q
♥K9
♦A76
♣KQJ8754
|
♠KT7
♥T732
♦54
♣A632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 0.00 4♠ S -1 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
50 1.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
50 1.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
130 1.00 0.00 4♣ W 4 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 2-Larson-Larson
400 0.00 0.00 3N E 3 2-Larson-Larson vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
400 0.00 0.00 3N E 3 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
400 0.00 0.00 5♣ W 5 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
130 0.00 0.00 4♣ W 4 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
|
19 |
♠T54
♥KQ75
♦KQT97
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q96
♥842
♦52
♣AJT32
|
♠J3
♥AT
♦843
♣987654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 1.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
450 1.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
420 0.50 0.00 4♠ S 4 2-Larson-Larson vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
420 0.50 0.00 4♠ S 4 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 2-Larson-Larson
420 0.50 0.00 4♥ S 4 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
420 0.50 0.00 4♥ S 4 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
50 0.00 0.00 5♠ S -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
420 0.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
|
20 |
♠986
♥AJ7
♦T872
♣AK6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ43
♥-
♦Q3
♣JT87542
|
♠JT72
♥KT95
♦KJ64
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1/-NT ♥6/5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
140 1.00 0.00 2♠ W 3 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
200 1.00 0.00 4♥ S -2 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
100 1.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 2-Larson-Larson
170 0.00 0.00 2♠ W 4 2-Larson-Larson vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
300 0.00 0.00 4♥ S -3 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
300 0.00 0.00 4♥ S -3 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
100 0.00 0.00 3♥ S -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
|
21 |
♠QJT42
♥654
♦J53
♣96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A83
♥JT97
♦A42
♣T84
|
♠K6
♥AQ
♦T986
♣AKJ73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 0.00 3N W -2 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
400 1.00 0.00 3N E 3 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
110 1.00 0.00 3♣ E 3 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 2-Larson-Larson
400 0.50 0.00 3N E 3 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
400 0.50 0.00 3N E 3 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
460 0.00 0.00 3N E 5 2-Larson-Larson vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
430 0.00 0.00 3N E 4 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
400 0.00 0.00 3N E 3 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
|
22 |
♠T
♥T532
♦AQJ32
♣743
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ85
♥KQ8
♦K8
♣K862
|
♠A6432
♥74
♦T95
♣AQT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
620 1.00 0.00 4♠ W 4 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
100 1.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
100 1.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
620 0.00 0.00 4♠ W 4 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
650 0.00 0.00 4♠ W 5 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
620 0.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
140 0.00 0.00 3♠ E 3 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
|
23 |
♠Q94
♥Q8
♦A42
♣K6532
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠62
♥AT76
♦KT9865
♣Q
|
♠A53
♥J42
♦J7
♣AJT98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥5/4 NT4/5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
PASS 1.00 0.00 Pass Out 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
PASS 1.00 0.00 Pass Out 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
100 0.50 0.00 2♠ S -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
100 0.50 0.00 2♠ S -1 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
120 0.00 0.00 1N E 2 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
100 0.00 0.00 4♠ S -1 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
110 0.00 0.00 3♦ W 3 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
|
24 |
♠AKQT762
♥8
♦A94
♣T6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠95
♥J975432
♦Q8
♣K3
|
♠J
♥AQ6
♦JT7653
♣952
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5/6♠ 5NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 1.00 0.00 5♠ N 6 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
480 1.00 0.00 4♠ N 6 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
450 1.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
450 0.50 0.00 4♠ N 5 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
450 0.50 0.00 4♠ N 5 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
50 0.00 0.00 6N S -1 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
450 0.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
450 0.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
|
25 |
♠Q762
♥Q75
♦642
♣A82
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J5
♥AJ964
♦A73
♣Q97
|
♠K93
♥KT82
♦QJ85
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 0.00 3♠ S -2 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
110 1.00 0.00 2♥ W 2 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
100 0.50 0.00 4♥ W -1 2-Larson-Larson vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
140 0.50 0.00 3♥ W 3 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
140 0.50 0.00 3♥ W 3 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
100 0.50 0.00 3♥ W -1 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 2-Larson-Larson
140 0.00 0.00 3♥ W 3 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
170 0.00 0.00 2♥ W 4 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
|
26 |
♠982
♥52
♦A753
♣9842
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠T7
♥J843
♦J864
♣AQ6
|
♠K6543
♥KQ9
♦KT2
♣KT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.00 0.00 2N W -2 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
100 1.00 0.00 2N S -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
120 1.00 0.00 1N W 2 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
120 0.50 0.00 1N W 2 2-Larson-Larson vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
120 0.50 0.00 1N W 2 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 2-Larson-Larson
200 0.00 0.00 2N S -2 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
90 0.00 0.00 1N W 1 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
200 0.00 0.00 2♦ N -2 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
|
27 |
♠63
♥AK
♦984
♣AQJ964
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ984
♥T42
♦AJ53
♣3
|
♠KT752
♥53
♦T2
♣T752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 1.00 0.00 5♥ S 6 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 1-Fidelman-Dahl
450 1.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 4-McEvoy-Hahn
420 1.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 2-Larson-Larson
480 0.50 0.00 5♥ S 6 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
480 0.50 0.00 4♥ S 6 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
50 0.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 2-Larson-Larson vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
50 0.00 0.00 5♥ S -1 4-McEvoy-Hahn vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
450 0.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 1-Fidelman-Dahl vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
|
28 |
♠KQ3
♥AT97
♦5
♣76542
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T42
♥652
♦AK987
♣J8
|
♠J75
♥J8
♦Q643
♣AKT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.00 0.00 1♥ S 4 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
170 1.00 0.00 1♥ N 4 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
50 1.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 2-Larson-Larson vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
170 0.50 0.00 2♥ N 4 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
170 0.50 0.00 1♥ N 4 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
100 0.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 2-Larson-Larson
140 0.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
130 0.00 0.00 3♦ E 4 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
|
29 |
♠KJ982
♥2
♦QJT5
♣AK9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠-
♥AQJ
♦K76432
♣T732
|
♠AQT76
♥K965
♦-
♣J654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥6/5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
670 1.00 0.00 2♠* S 2 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
100 1.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
100 1.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 2-Larson-Larson
100 0.50 0.00 2♠ N -1 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
100 0.50 0.00 2♠ N -1 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
500 0.00 0.00 3♠* N -2 2-Larson-Larson vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
200 0.00 0.00 2♠ N -2 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
200 0.00 0.00 2♠ N -2 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
|
30 |
♠K5
♥K3
♦A864
♣AT943
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠JT9
♥QJ86
♦J2
♣K876
|
♠AQ86
♥72
♦KQT97
♣52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1/-NT ♦6/5 ♠6 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 1.00 0.00 1N W -3 2-Larson-Larson vs 10-Kinsey-Roberts
50 1.00 0.00 1N W -1 9-Fedder-Beecher vs 3-Rubin-Rubin
90 1.00 0.00 1N N 1 5-Holcomb-Callahan vs 8-Lubesnik-Cannon
150 1.00 0.00 2♦ E -3 6-Zolotow-Lafleur vs 7-Rieckers-Kallina
100 0.00 0.00 2♥ S -2 3-Rubin-Rubin vs 9-Fedder-Beecher
110 0.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 10-Kinsey-Roberts vs 2-Larson-Larson
50 0.00 0.00 2♦ N -1 8-Lubesnik-Cannon vs 5-Holcomb-Callahan
50 0.00 0.00 2♣ N -1 7-Rieckers-Kallina vs 6-Zolotow-Lafleur
|