Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!


Spring Mt. Bridge Club
12:30 pm ♦ Open Pairs
Saturday, February 21, 2015

Photo Gallery of Winners | ACBLmerge | ACBLscore | New Display

Event: Saturday Afternoon Pairs

Session: Saturday Aft

Movement: MITCHELL

Date: February 21, 2015

Rating: Club Masterpoint

Top: 5

Club No: 244830

Club: SPRING MOUNTAIN BRIDGE CL

Dir: Barbara Vasilevs

Field strength: Mean: 1301 MP
Geomean: 459 MP
(based on 21 players)

 

Name

Name

Dir

No

Flt

A

B

C

Result

Points

1

Daryl Sulerud

Sue Chun

N-S

2

C

1

1

1

62.92

0.60

2

Barbara Dunkley

Diane Graese

E-W

6

A

2

-

-

60.00

0.60

3

Justine Hancock

Barbara Mikkelson

E-W

1

B

3

2

-

59.58

0.42

4

Don Baltz

Barbara Geil

N-S

5

C

4

3

2

57.50

0.42

5

Mel Fineberg

Ernest Ledbetter

E-W

4

A

5

-

-

55.00

6

Linda Schanz

Meg Harrington

N-S

4

B

6

4

-

53.33

7

George Vasilevsky

Joe Caplan

N-S

3

A

7

-

-

52.50

8

Judith Ann Gillespie

Jacqueline Harrigan

E-W

2

B

8

5

-

47.08

0.22

9

Joyce Burke

Joan Williams

E-W

5

C

9

6

3

42.92

0.16

10

Donna Fisher

Maria Poh

N-S

6

C

10

7

4

37.08

11

Rosemary Hayden

Marina Marder

N-S

1

B

11

8

-

36.67

12

Monique Achtman

Myron Achtman

E-W

3

C

12

9

5

35.42

12 pairs


All Boards

Previous Board

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Next Board

1
Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

50

5.00

0.00

5-Geil-Baltz

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

90

4.00

1.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

100

2.50

2.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

100

2.50

2.50

6-Poh-Fisher

5-Burke-Williams

 

110

0.50

4.50

1-Hayden-Marder

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

110

0.50

4.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

2
Dlr: East 
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

50

 

5.00

0.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

100

3.50

1.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

100

3.50

1.50

5-Geil-Baltz

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

120

2.00

3.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

200

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

5-Burke-Williams

 

800

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

3
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

430

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

400

 

2.50

2.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

400

 

2.50

2.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

6-Dunkley-Graese

400

 

2.50

2.50

5-Geil-Baltz

3-Achtman-Achtman

400

 

2.50

2.50

6-Poh-Fisher

5-Burke-Williams

120

 

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

4
Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

120

 

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

120

 

3.00

2.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

120

 

3.00

2.00

5-Geil-Baltz

3-Achtman-Achtman

100

 

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

5-Burke-Williams

 

100

0.00

5.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

6-Dunkley-Graese

5
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

430

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

430

4.00

1.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

430

4.00

1.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

5-Burke-Williams

 

490

1.50

3.50

1-Hayden-Marder

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

490

1.50

3.50

6-Poh-Fisher

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

990

0.00

5.00

5-Geil-Baltz

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

6
Dlr: East 
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

5-Burke-Williams

100

 

3.50

1.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

100

 

3.50

1.50

5-Geil-Baltz

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

90

2.00

3.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

110

0.50

4.50

1-Hayden-Marder

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

110

0.50

4.50

6-Poh-Fisher

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

7
Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

100

 

4.50

0.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

5-Burke-Williams

100

 

4.50

0.50

5-Geil-Baltz

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

620

2.00

3.00

1-Hayden-Marder

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

620

2.00

3.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

620

2.00

3.00

6-Poh-Fisher

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

660

0.00

5.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

3-Achtman-Achtman

8
Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

110

5.00

0.00

6-Poh-Fisher

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

120

3.50

1.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

120

3.50

1.50

5-Geil-Baltz

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

130

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

5-Burke-Williams

 

150

1.00

4.00

1-Hayden-Marder

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

180

0.00

5.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

9
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

460

 

5.00

0.00

1-Hayden-Marder

5-Burke-Williams

430

 

3.50

1.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

6-Dunkley-Graese

430

 

3.50

1.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

400

 

1.50

3.50

5-Geil-Baltz

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

400

 

1.50

3.50

6-Poh-Fisher

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

50

0.00

5.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

10
Dlr: East 
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

660

 

5.00

0.00

6-Poh-Fisher

3-Achtman-Achtman

620

 

2.50

2.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

6-Dunkley-Graese

620

 

2.50

2.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

620

 

2.50

2.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

620

 

2.50

2.50

5-Geil-Baltz

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

170

 

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

5-Burke-Williams

11
Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

170

 

5.00

0.00

6-Poh-Fisher

3-Achtman-Achtman

100

 

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

6-Dunkley-Graese

50

 

3.00

2.00

5-Geil-Baltz

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

50

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

100

1.00

4.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

130

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

5-Burke-Williams

12
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

100

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

50

 

4.00

1.00

5-Geil-Baltz

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

100

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

5-Burke-Williams

 

130

1.50

3.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

130

1.50

3.50

6-Poh-Fisher

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

200

0.00

5.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

6-Dunkley-Graese

13
Dlr: North
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

140

 

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

5-Burke-Williams

100

 

3.00

2.00

6-Poh-Fisher

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

100

1.50

3.50

1-Hayden-Marder

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

100

1.50

3.50

5-Geil-Baltz

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

110

0.00

5.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

3-Achtman-Achtman

14
Dlr: East 
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

50

 

4.50

0.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

3-Achtman-Achtman

50

 

4.50

0.50

5-Geil-Baltz

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

100

2.50

2.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

5-Burke-Williams

 

100

2.50

2.50

6-Poh-Fisher

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

110

0.50

4.50

1-Hayden-Marder

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

110

0.50

4.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

15
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

140

 

5.00

0.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

5-Burke-Williams

110

 

4.00

1.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

100

2.00

3.00

1-Hayden-Marder

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

100

2.00

3.00

5-Geil-Baltz

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

100

2.00

3.00

6-Poh-Fisher

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

300

0.00

5.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

16
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

510

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

400

 

4.00

1.00

5-Geil-Baltz

6-Dunkley-Graese

200

 

3.00

2.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

5-Burke-Williams

100

 

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

50

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

110

0.00

5.00

1-Hayden-Marder

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

17
Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

520

4.00

1.00

1-Hayden-Marder

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

520

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

520

4.00

1.00

5-Geil-Baltz

5-Burke-Williams

 

1020

1.00

4.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

1020

1.00

4.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

1020

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

18
Dlr: East 
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

660

 

5.00

0.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

6-Dunkley-Graese

620

 

4.00

1.00

5-Geil-Baltz

5-Burke-Williams

600

 

2.00

3.00

1-Hayden-Marder

3-Achtman-Achtman

600

 

2.00

3.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

600

 

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

150

 

0.00

5.00

6-Poh-Fisher

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

19
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

400

 

4.50

0.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

400

 

4.50

0.50

4-Schanz-Harrington

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

100

 

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

50

2.00

3.00

6-Poh-Fisher

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

150

0.50

4.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

150

0.50

4.50

5-Geil-Baltz

5-Burke-Williams

20
Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

600

5.00

0.00

5-Geil-Baltz

5-Burke-Williams

 

690

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

690

3.00

2.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

690

3.00

2.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

1370

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

1430

0.00

5.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

6-Dunkley-Graese

21
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

50

 

4.50

0.50

2-Chun-Sulerud

3-Achtman-Achtman

50

 

4.50

0.50

5-Geil-Baltz

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

110

3.00

2.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

5-Burke-Williams

 

130

1.00

4.00

1-Hayden-Marder

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

130

1.00

4.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

130

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

6-Dunkley-Graese

22
Dlr: East 
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

150

4.00

1.00

1-Hayden-Marder

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

 

150

4.00

1.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

3-Achtman-Achtman

 

150

4.00

1.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

600

2.00

3.00

5-Geil-Baltz

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

630

0.50

4.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

5-Burke-Williams

 

630

0.50

4.50

6-Poh-Fisher

6-Dunkley-Graese

23
Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

3-Achtman-Achtman

100

 

3.50

1.50

1-Hayden-Marder

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

100

 

3.50

1.50

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

5-Burke-Williams

 

600

2.00

3.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

630

1.00

4.00

6-Poh-Fisher

6-Dunkley-Graese

 

660

0.00

5.00

5-Geil-Baltz

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

24
Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

430

 

5.00

0.00

2-Chun-Sulerud

3-Achtman-Achtman

400

 

3.00

2.00

1-Hayden-Marder

2-Harrigan-Ann Gillespie

400

 

3.00

2.00

3-Caplan-Vasilevsky

5-Burke-Williams

400

 

3.00

2.00

4-Schanz-Harrington

1-Mikkelson-Hancock

 

50

0.50

4.50

5-Geil-Baltz

4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

 

50

0.50

4.50

6-Poh-Fisher

6-Dunkley-Graese