Bridge Results

Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!

Bridge Center of Las Vegas
Noon ♦ Saturday Open Stratified Pairs - Club Championship
Saturday, November 22, 2025

Photo Gallery of Winners | Hand Records

Event: Saturday Afternoon Pairs	Session: Saturday Aft	Movement: MITCHELL
Date: November 22, 2025	Rating: Club Championship	Section: A
Club No: 278499	Club: Bridge Center Of Las Vega	Dir: Justine Hancock
MP Limits: None/3500	Average: 60	Top: 5

Field strength: Mean: 4165 MP
Geomean: 1297 MP
(based on 24 players)

Both Directions Grouped - Pairs in strats: A=12 / B=9

Split by Direction

Overall

Section

A

B

A

B

Maureen Pechacek

N-S

6

A

1

1

80.00

2.33

Barbara Dunkley

E-W

6

B

2

1

1

1

70.50

1.75

Barbara Mikkelson

Justine Hancock

E-W

5

B

3

2

2

2

68.00

1.31

N-S

1

A

4

2

66.50

0.98

E-W

2

B

-

3

-

-

64.50

0.96

N-S

4

B

-

4

-

1

62.00

0.72

Dane Lindenmuth

E-W

1

B

-

-

-

-

56.50

Michael Folkert

N-S

2

B

-

-

-

2

55.50

0.22

William Schlosser

N-S

5

B

-

-

-

-

54.50

E-W

3

B

-

-

-

-

54.00

E-W

4

A

-

-

46.50

Patricia Dillingham

N-S

3

B

-

-

-

-

41.50

12 pairs - Pairs in strats: A=12 / B=9
Click on a result to see the recap for this pair.

You can move from board to board by using the arrow keys on your keyboard.
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24

1

Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
150		5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	4-Johnson-Rink
100		4.00	1.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	3-Bowen-Gaines
50		2.00	3.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
50		2.00	3.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	2-Conroy-Jacobson
50		2.00	3.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	6-Hall-Dunkley
	50	0.00	5.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	5-Mikkelson-Hancock

2

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
230		5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	4-Johnson-Rink
200		4.00	1.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	6-Hall-Dunkley
170		3.00	2.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
150		2.00	3.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	90	1.00	4.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	3-Bowen-Gaines
	100	0.00	5.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	5-Mikkelson-Hancock

3

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
990		5.00	0.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
480		4.00	1.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	3-Bowen-Gaines
450		2.50	2.50	1-Ullman-Ullman	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
450		2.50	2.50	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	6-Hall-Dunkley
430		1.00	4.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	4-Johnson-Rink
	50	0.00	5.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	2-Conroy-Jacobson

4

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
170		5.00	0.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	140	4.00	1.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	4-Johnson-Rink
	170	3.00	2.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	620	1.00	4.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	620	1.00	4.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	6-Hall-Dunkley
	620	1.00	4.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	3-Bowen-Gaines

5

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	170	4.50	0.50	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	3-Bowen-Gaines
	170	4.50	0.50	5-Moore-Schlosser	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	230	3.00	2.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	6-Hall-Dunkley
	420	2.00	3.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	450	1.00	4.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	1100	0.00	5.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	4-Johnson-Rink

6

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
400		5.00	0.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
140		4.00	1.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
130		2.50	2.50	2-Kavall-Folkert	2-Conroy-Jacobson
130		2.50	2.50	3-Alperin-Dillingham	4-Johnson-Rink
110		1.00	4.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	6-Hall-Dunkley
	100	0.00	5.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	3-Bowen-Gaines

7

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
1460		5.00	0.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
710		4.00	1.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	6-Hall-Dunkley
680		3.00	2.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	3-Bowen-Gaines
650		1.50	3.50	2-Kavall-Folkert	2-Conroy-Jacobson
650		1.50	3.50	3-Alperin-Dillingham	4-Johnson-Rink
620		0.00	5.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth

8

Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
100		5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	3-Bowen-Gaines
50		3.50	1.50	2-Kavall-Folkert	2-Conroy-Jacobson
50		3.50	1.50	3-Alperin-Dillingham	4-Johnson-Rink
	100	1.50	3.50	5-Moore-Schlosser	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	100	1.50	3.50	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	140	0.00	5.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	6-Hall-Dunkley

9

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
420		4.00	1.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	4-Johnson-Rink
420		4.00	1.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
420		4.00	1.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	2-Conroy-Jacobson
130		2.00	3.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	3-Bowen-Gaines
	50	1.00	4.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	100	0.00	5.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	6-Hall-Dunkley

10

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	110	5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	140	3.00	2.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	4-Johnson-Rink
	140	3.00	2.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	140	3.00	2.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	6-Hall-Dunkley
	170	0.50	4.50	3-Alperin-Dillingham	3-Bowen-Gaines
	170	0.50	4.50	2-Kavall-Folkert	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth

11

Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
50		5.00	0.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	6-Hall-Dunkley
	420	4.00	1.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	450	2.50	2.50	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	4-Johnson-Rink
	450	2.50	2.50	2-Kavall-Folkert	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	500	0.50	4.50	3-Alperin-Dillingham	3-Bowen-Gaines
	500	0.50	4.50	1-Ullman-Ullman	5-Mikkelson-Hancock

12

Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
630		5.00	0.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	3-Bowen-Gaines
620		4.00	1.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	4-Johnson-Rink
170		2.50	2.50	1-Ullman-Ullman	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
170		2.50	2.50	5-Moore-Schlosser	6-Hall-Dunkley
80		1.00	4.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	100	0.00	5.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	2-Conroy-Jacobson

13

Dlr: North
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
140		5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	100	4.00	1.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	3-Bowen-Gaines
	110	3.00	2.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	4-Johnson-Rink
	170	2.00	3.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	200	1.00	4.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	6-Hall-Dunkley
	500	0.00	5.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	5-Mikkelson-Hancock

14

Dlr: East
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
140		5.00	0.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	4-Johnson-Rink
130		4.00	1.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	3-Bowen-Gaines
110		3.00	2.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
50		2.00	3.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	6-Hall-Dunkley
	100	1.00	4.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	110	0.00	5.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	5-Mikkelson-Hancock

15

Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
50		5.00	0.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	4-Johnson-Rink
	150	4.00	1.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	400	3.00	2.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	6-Hall-Dunkley
	420	2.00	3.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	3-Bowen-Gaines
	450	0.50	4.50	5-Moore-Schlosser	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	450	0.50	4.50	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth

16

Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
430		5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
420		4.00	1.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	4-Johnson-Rink
400		3.00	2.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	50	1.00	4.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	50	1.00	4.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	3-Bowen-Gaines
	50	1.00	4.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	6-Hall-Dunkley

17

Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
450		5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	6-Hall-Dunkley
420		3.00	2.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	4-Johnson-Rink
420		3.00	2.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
420		3.00	2.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	3-Bowen-Gaines
140		0.50	4.50	3-Alperin-Dillingham	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
140		0.50	4.50	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	2-Conroy-Jacobson

18

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	130	5.00	0.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	3-Bowen-Gaines
	150	4.00	1.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	400	2.50	2.50	5-Moore-Schlosser	4-Johnson-Rink
	400	2.50	2.50	2-Kavall-Folkert	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	460	1.00	4.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	6-Hall-Dunkley
	490	0.00	5.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	2-Conroy-Jacobson

19

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
500		5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	6-Hall-Dunkley
130		4.00	1.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	50	2.50	2.50	2-Kavall-Folkert	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	50	2.50	2.50	1-Ullman-Ullman	3-Bowen-Gaines
	100	1.00	4.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	4-Johnson-Rink
	250	0.00	5.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	2-Conroy-Jacobson

20

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	660	5.00	0.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	690	2.00	3.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	6-Hall-Dunkley
	690	2.00	3.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	4-Johnson-Rink
	690	2.00	3.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	690	2.00	3.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	690	2.00	3.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	3-Bowen-Gaines

21

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
50		5.00	0.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	3-Bowen-Gaines
	130	4.00	1.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	150	3.00	2.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	4-Johnson-Rink
	400	1.00	4.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	400	1.00	4.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	6-Hall-Dunkley
	400	1.00	4.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth

22

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	90	5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
	100	4.00	1.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	3-Bowen-Gaines
	200	2.00	3.00	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
	200	2.00	3.00	2-Kavall-Folkert	4-Johnson-Rink
	200	2.00	3.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	2-Conroy-Jacobson
	250	0.00	5.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	6-Hall-Dunkley

23

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
620		5.00	0.00	1-Ullman-Ullman	2-Conroy-Jacobson
600		3.50	1.50	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
600		3.50	1.50	2-Kavall-Folkert	4-Johnson-Rink
170		2.00	3.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
150		1.00	4.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	3-Bowen-Gaines
	800	0.00	5.00	3-Alperin-Dillingham	6-Hall-Dunkley

24

Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
110		5.00	0.00	6-Hamilton-Pechacek	5-Mikkelson-Hancock
90		3.50	1.50	4-Zeibert-Zeibert	1-Hoy-Lindenmuth
90		3.50	1.50	2-Kavall-Folkert	4-Johnson-Rink
	100	2.00	3.00	5-Moore-Schlosser	3-Bowen-Gaines
	150	0.50	4.50	3-Alperin-Dillingham	6-Hall-Dunkley
	150	0.50	4.50	1-Ullman-Ullman	2-Conroy-Jacobson