| 1 |
♠-
♥KQJ2
♦KT82
♣A7432
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
♠T42
♥653
♦QJ7654
♣Q
|
♠AK753
♥874
♦A3
♣K85
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
10 |
6 |
9 |
7 |
8 |
South |
10 |
7 |
9 |
7 |
9 |
East |
2 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
West |
2 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
500 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
4♦* |
W |
-3 |
-1 |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
150 |
|
1.50 |
1.50 |
2N |
S |
3 |
- |
8-Brand-Bradley |
1-Lane-Nasser |
150 |
|
1.50 |
1.50 |
2♣ |
S |
5 |
+1 |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
|
150 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3♥ |
N |
-3 |
-3 |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 2 |
♠983
♥A2
♦T85
♣AJT87
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
♠AT642
♥7
♦J9732
♣Q6
|
♠J5
♥KQ9854
♦Q6
♣432
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
10 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
10 |
South |
10 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
10 |
East |
3 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
West |
3 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
600 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
3N |
N |
3 |
-1 |
8-Brand-Bradley |
1-Lane-Nasser |
600 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
3N |
S |
3 |
-1 |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
600 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
5♣ |
S |
5 |
+1 |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
150 |
|
0.00 |
3.00 |
3♣ |
N |
5 |
+1 |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 3 |
♠T
♥K4
♦AKT93
♣Q9432
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
♠A76
♥JT96
♦Q2
♣AT85
|
♠Q953
♥A72
♦874
♣K76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
7 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
South |
7 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
East |
6 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
West |
6 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
180 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
2N |
N |
4 |
+3 |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
110 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
3♦ |
N |
3 |
+1 |
1-Lane-Nasser |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
|
50 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
2♦ |
N |
-1 |
-1 |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
|
150 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3N |
N |
-3 |
-1 |
8-Brand-Bradley |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 4 |
♠Q4
♥AQJ52
♦32
♣KT82
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
♠AT32
♥T7
♦K7
♣A9765
|
♠9765
♥943
♦AQ954
♣3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
7 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
South |
7 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
East |
5 |
7 |
4 |
9 |
5 |
West |
5 |
7 |
4 |
9 |
5 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
140 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
3♥ |
N |
3 |
+2 |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
100 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
2♠ |
W |
-1 |
+2 |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
Pass |
1.00 |
2.00 |
Pass Out |
- |
8-Brand-Bradley |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
|
100 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3♥ |
N |
-1 |
+1 |
1-Lane-Nasser |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 5 |
♠63
♥K875
♦AJ2
♣KJ53
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
♠J82
♥AQJ432
♦97
♣62
|
♠KQ74
♥T6
♦T643
♣974
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
12 |
10 |
6 |
9 |
10 |
South |
12 |
10 |
6 |
9 |
10 |
East |
1 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
West |
1 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
630 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
3N |
N |
4 |
- |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
620 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
5♣ |
N |
6 |
- |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
130 |
|
0.50 |
2.50 |
3♣ |
S |
4 |
-2 |
8-Brand-Bradley |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
130 |
|
0.50 |
2.50 |
3♣ |
N |
4 |
-2 |
1-Lane-Nasser |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 6 |
♠32
♥KQ65
♦942
♣KJ53
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
♠AKT9875
♥2
♦QJ8
♣Q8
|
♠J4
♥8743
♦K753
♣T96
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
9 |
7 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
South |
9 |
7 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
East |
4 |
6 |
4 |
9 |
4 |
West |
4 |
6 |
4 |
9 |
4 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
500 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
4♠* |
W |
-2 |
+1 |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
420 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
4♥ |
S |
4 |
+1 |
8-Brand-Bradley |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
|
50 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
3♥ |
S |
-1 |
-1 |
1-Lane-Nasser |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
|
100 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
4♥ |
N |
-2 |
-1 |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 7 |
♠QT9
♥AK9
♦J9
♣K9643
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
♠A8765
♥5
♦AT3
♣AQJ7
|
♠KJ43
♥QJT
♦K764
♣T8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
4 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
South |
4 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
East |
9 |
9 |
5 |
11 |
10 |
West |
9 |
9 |
5 |
11 |
10 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
|
90 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
1♣ |
W |
2 |
+1 |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
|
110 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
2♠ |
W |
2 |
+3 |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
1-Lane-Nasser |
|
620 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
4♠ |
W |
4 |
+1 |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
|
650 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
4♠ |
E |
5 |
- |
8-Brand-Bradley |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 8 |
♠A9876
♥QT5
♦AQ83
♣5
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
♠J5
♥J872
♦9765
♣Q92
|
♠K42
♥AK4
♦K4
♣A7643
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
5 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
South |
6 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
East |
7 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
West |
7 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
140 |
|
2.50 |
0.50 |
2♠ |
N |
3 |
+1 |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
140 |
|
2.50 |
0.50 |
3♠ |
N |
3 |
+1 |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
110 |
|
0.50 |
2.50 |
2♠ |
N |
2 |
- |
8-Brand-Bradley |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
110 |
|
0.50 |
2.50 |
2♠ |
N |
2 |
- |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
1-Lane-Nasser |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 9 |
♠KQ532
♥T7
♦A72
♣T83
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W |
|
♠987
♥AKQ4
♦J543
♣K2
|
♠T64
♥65
♦T98
♣AQ965
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
5 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
5 |
South |
5 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
5 |
East |
6 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
West |
6 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
430 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
3N |
S |
4 |
+5 |
1-Lane-Nasser |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
110 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
2♥ |
N |
2 |
+1 |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
|
50 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
2♥ |
S |
-1 |
- |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
|
100 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3♠ |
N |
-2 |
-1 |
8-Brand-Bradley |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 10 |
♠742
♥AQT8
♦943
♣Q43
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both |
|
♠AQ6
♥643
♦KJ5
♣AJT9
|
♠KT98
♥J952
♦A8
♣765
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
4 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
South |
4 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
East |
9 |
7 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
West |
9 |
7 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
100 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
3N |
W |
-1 |
+1 |
1-Lane-Nasser |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
|
110 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
2♣ |
W |
3 |
- |
8-Brand-Bradley |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
|
120 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
1N |
W |
2 |
+1 |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
|
180 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
2N |
W |
4 |
-1 |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 11 |
♠QT
♥8432
♦A97
♣6432
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None |
|
♠A543
♥K975
♦86
♣JT9
|
♠K986
♥AQT
♦T42
♣AK8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
5 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
South |
5 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
East |
8 |
6 |
9 |
10 |
8 |
West |
8 |
6 |
9 |
10 |
8 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
|
140 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
3♥ |
W |
3 |
- |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
1-Lane-Nasser |
|
170 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
3♠ |
E |
4 |
- |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
|
420 |
0.50 |
2.50 |
4♠ |
E |
4 |
- |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
|
420 |
0.50 |
2.50 |
4♠ |
E |
4 |
- |
8-Brand-Bradley |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 12 |
♠Q652
♥2
♦K62
♣AKJ94
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S |
|
♠KT984
♥AKJ9
♦T97
♣7
|
♠J73
♥T8764
♦853
♣QT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
12 |
11 |
7 |
7 |
10 |
South |
12 |
11 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
East |
0 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
West |
0 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
640 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
5♣ |
N |
7 |
+1 |
8-Brand-Bradley |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
620 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
5♣ |
S |
6 |
- |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
170 |
|
1.00 |
2.00 |
3♣ |
N |
6 |
- |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
1-Lane-Nasser |
130 |
|
0.00 |
3.00 |
2♦ |
S |
4 |
-1 |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 13 |
♠Q985
♥Q642
♦92
♣932
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both |
|
♠K763
♥AK5
♦Q
♣AK754
|
♠A42
♥T3
♦AJ7543
♣QJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
South |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
East |
11 |
11 |
9 |
11 |
11 |
West |
11 |
11 |
9 |
11 |
11 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
200 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
6♠ |
E |
-2 |
+1 |
8-Brand-Bradley |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
|
180 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
2N |
W |
4 |
+1 |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
1-Lane-Nasser |
|
620 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
5♦ |
W |
6 |
-1 |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
|
660 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3N |
W |
5 |
- |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 14 |
♠T5
♥QT83
♦KQ82
♣J76
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None |
|
♠J6
♥KJ54
♦AJT5
♣Q92
|
♠742
♥A9
♦764
♣AKT83
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
3 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
South |
3 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
East |
9 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
West |
9 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
110 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
2♠ |
S |
2 |
+1 |
3-Litkowski-Sobel |
1-Lane-Nasser |
100 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
3♦ |
W |
-2 |
+1 |
6-Rouge-Kravitz |
2-Galusha-Galusha |
|
110 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
3♣ |
E |
3 |
- |
8-Brand-Bradley |
7-Van Matre-Geiger |
|
300 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3♦ |
N |
-6 |
-2 |
5-Witkin-Witkin |
4-Wyman-Wyman |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
