Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!


Goderich Duplicate Bridge Club
1:00 ♦ Lessons & Mentor Game
Monday, April 4, 2016

Photo Gallery of Winners

Event: Monday Mentor

Session: Monday Aft

Movement: ONE WINNER

Date: April 4, 2016

Rating: No Masterpoints

Section: A

Club No: 131474

Club: Gdbc

Dir: Charles

MP Limits: None/None/None

Average: 60

Top: 5

Field strength: Mean: 68 MP
Geomean: 18 MP
(based on 16 players)

 

Overall

Section

 

 

Name

Name

No

Flt

A

B

C

A

B

C

Score

Result

Points

1

Kaye Alexander

Joyce Pinkney

7

C

1

1

1

1

1

1

76.07

63.39

2

Mary Lynne Telford

Mary Lapaine

1

C

2

2

2

2

2

2

71.85

59.88

3

Kay King

Rosemarie Evans

10

C

3

3

3

3

3

3

69.75

58.13

4

Cal Scotchmer

Janet Bloch

8

C

4

4

4

4

4

4

65.65

54.71

5

Charles Rogers

Doreen Lalor

5

C

-

-

-

5

5

5

64.45

53.71

6

Bill Teall

Kate Teall

11

C

-

-

-

-

-

-

61.25

51.04

7

Maureen Logel

Mary Jameson

6

C

-

-

-

-

-

-

59.75

49.79

8

Willy Simpson

Marilyn Thomas

4

C

-

-

-

-

-

-

52.40

43.67

9

Isabelle Moore

Kay Duncan

12

C

-

-

-

-

-

-

52.15

43.46

10

Rose Ann Morris

Mike Cox

2

C

-

-

-

-

-

-

51.90

43.25

11

Dianne Wolfe

Elaine Phillips

3

C

-

-

-

-

-

-

48.75

40.63

12

Joyce Zimmerman

Martha Archbold

9

C

-

-

-

-

-

-

46.75

38.96

12 pairs - Pairs in strats: C=12
Click on a result to see the recap for this pair.


You can move from board to board by using the arrow keys on your keyboard.

All Boards

Previous Board

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Next Board

1
Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

110

 

4.90

0.10

1

N

2

K

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

7-Alexander-Pinkney

100

 

3.10

1.90

1

E

-2

5

5-Rogers-Lalor

2-Morris-Cox

100

 

3.10

1.90

1

E

-2

5

6-Logel-Jameson

10-King-Evans

80

 

1.30

3.70

1

N

1

5

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

4-Simpson-Thomas

50

 

0.10

4.90

1N

E

-1

3

12-Moore-Duncan

1-Telford-Lapaine

2
Dlr: East 
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

800

 

4.90

0.10

3*

W

-4

10

5-Rogers-Lalor

2-Morris-Cox

660

 

3.70

1.30

3N

N

5

3

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

7-Alexander-Pinkney

650

 

1.90

3.10

4

N

5

2

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

4-Simpson-Thomas

650

 

1.90

3.10

4

N

5

3

6-Logel-Jameson

10-King-Evans

 

200

0.10

4.90

4

S

-2

K

12-Moore-Duncan

1-Telford-Lapaine

3
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

100

 

4.90

0.10

1

E

-1

K

6-Logel-Jameson

10-King-Evans

 

50

3.70

1.30

3

S

-1

3

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

4-Simpson-Thomas

 

100

2.50

2.50

4*

N

-1

5

5-Rogers-Lalor

2-Morris-Cox

 

140

1.30

3.70

2

E

3

10

12-Moore-Duncan

1-Telford-Lapaine

 

170

0.10

4.90

2

E

4

A

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

7-Alexander-Pinkney

4
Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

300

 

4.30

0.70

3N

W

-3

6

11-Teall-Teall

4-Simpson-Thomas

300

 

4.30

0.70

3N

W

-3

3

6-Logel-Jameson

3-Wolfe-Phillips

100

 

1.90

3.10

4

W

-1

K

12-Moore-Duncan

2-Morris-Cox

100

 

1.90

3.10

3N

E

-1

9

1-Telford-Lapaine

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

 

600

0.10

4.90

3N

W

3

9

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

5-Rogers-Lalor

5
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

620

 

4.90

0.10

4

N

4

9

6-Logel-Jameson

3-Wolfe-Phillips

200

 

3.70

1.30

2

S

5

3

12-Moore-Duncan

2-Morris-Cox

170

 

2.50

2.50

3

N

4

7

11-Teall-Teall

4-Simpson-Thomas

150

 

1.30

3.70

2

E

-3

A

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

5-Rogers-Lalor

 

200

0.10

4.90

5*

N

-1

J

1-Telford-Lapaine

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

6
Dlr: East 
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

300

 

4.90

0.10

4

W

-3

6

1-Telford-Lapaine

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

200

 

3.70

1.30

3

E

-2

A

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

5-Rogers-Lalor

170

 

2.50

2.50

2

S

4

A

12-Moore-Duncan

2-Morris-Cox

140

 

0.70

4.30

2

S

3

2

11-Teall-Teall

4-Simpson-Thomas

140

 

0.70

4.30

2

S

3

2

6-Logel-Jameson

3-Wolfe-Phillips

7
Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

110

 

4.90

0.10

3

N

3

4

7-Alexander-Pinkney

4-Simpson-Thomas

 

100

3.70

1.30

3

N

-1

8

10-King-Evans

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

 

140

1.30

3.70

1

W

3

Q

11-Teall-Teall

5-Rogers-Lalor

 

140

1.30

3.70

1

W

3

Q

12-Moore-Duncan

3-Wolfe-Phillips

 

140

1.30

3.70

1

W

3

Q

2-Morris-Cox

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

8
Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

490

 

4.30

0.70

3N

S

6

2

10-King-Evans

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

490

 

4.30

0.70

3N

S

6

2

2-Morris-Cox

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

480

 

1.90

3.10

4

S

6

2

11-Teall-Teall

5-Rogers-Lalor

480

 

1.90

3.10

4

S

6

2

7-Alexander-Pinkney

4-Simpson-Thomas

460

 

0.10

4.90

3N

N

5

3

12-Moore-Duncan

3-Wolfe-Phillips

9
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

480

 

4.90

0.10

4

S

6

2

7-Alexander-Pinkney

4-Simpson-Thomas

 

100

2.50

2.50

4

N

-2

6

10-King-Evans

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

 

100

2.50

2.50

3

N

-2

4

12-Moore-Duncan

3-Wolfe-Phillips

 

100

2.50

2.50

4

N

-2

6

2-Morris-Cox

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

 

150

0.10

4.90

3N

S

-3

K

11-Teall-Teall

5-Rogers-Lalor

10
Dlr: East 
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

100

 

4.90

0.10

3

W

-1

9

12-Moore-Duncan

4-Simpson-Thomas

 

110

3.70

1.30

2

W

3

3

10-King-Evans

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

 

150

2.50

2.50

2N

E

3

7

11-Teall-Teall

6-Logel-Jameson

 

600

0.70

4.30

3N

E

3

7

2-Morris-Cox

7-Alexander-Pinkney

 

600

0.70

4.30

3N

E

3

7

3-Wolfe-Phillips

1-Telford-Lapaine

11
Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

 

440

3.70

1.30

5

E

7

8

10-King-Evans

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

 

440

3.70

1.30

5

E

7

4

11-Teall-Teall

6-Logel-Jameson

 

440

3.70

1.30

5

W

7

5

3-Wolfe-Phillips

1-Telford-Lapaine

 

520

0.70

4.30

4N

W

7

J

2-Morris-Cox

7-Alexander-Pinkney

 

520

0.70

4.30

3N

W

7

J

12-Moore-Duncan

4-Simpson-Thomas

12
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

50

 

4.90

0.10

4

E

-1

5

12-Moore-Duncan

4-Simpson-Thomas

 

170

3.70

1.30

1

E

4

5

10-King-Evans

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

 

420

1.90

3.10

4

E

4

5

2-Morris-Cox

7-Alexander-Pinkney

 

420

1.90

3.10

4

E

4

4

11-Teall-Teall

6-Logel-Jameson

 

450

0.10

4.90

4

E

5

5

3-Wolfe-Phillips

1-Telford-Lapaine

13
Dlr: North
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

150

 

4.30

0.70

2N

S

3

2

3-Wolfe-Phillips

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

150

 

4.30

0.70

2N

S

3

2

7-Alexander-Pinkney

11-Teall-Teall

110

 

1.90

3.10

2

N

2

K

1-Telford-Lapaine

10-King-Evans

110

 

1.90

3.10

2

N

2

Q

12-Moore-Duncan

5-Rogers-Lalor

 

100

0.10

4.90

3N

S

-1

8

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

6-Logel-Jameson

14
Dlr: East 
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

150

 

4.30

0.70

3

S

5

A

1-Telford-Lapaine

10-King-Evans

150

 

4.30

0.70

3

S

5

A

7-Alexander-Pinkney

11-Teall-Teall

100

 

2.50

2.50

3

W

-2

A

12-Moore-Duncan

5-Rogers-Lalor

 

80

1.30

3.70

1

W

1

A

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

6-Logel-Jameson

 

110

0.10

4.90

1

W

2

5

3-Wolfe-Phillips

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

15
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

90

 

4.75

0.25

1N

N

1

8

12-Moore-Duncan

5-Rogers-Lalor

50

 

1.75

3.25

2N

E

-1

4

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

6-Logel-Jameson

50

 

1.75

3.25

1N

W

-1

3

3-Wolfe-Phillips

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

50

 

1.75

3.25

1N

W

-1

A

1-Telford-Lapaine

10-King-Evans

 

Late Play

0.00

0.00

 

 

7-Alexander-Pinkney

11-Teall-Teall

16
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

3N

E

-2

3

4-Simpson-Thomas

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

100

 

4.00

1.00

3N

W

-1

5

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

11-Teall-Teall

 

140

3.00

2.00

2

W

3

4

5-Rogers-Lalor

3-Wolfe-Phillips

 

150

2.00

3.00

2N

W

3

8

12-Moore-Duncan

6-Logel-Jameson

 

210

1.00

4.00

2N

W

5

7

2-Morris-Cox

10-King-Evans

 

600

0.00

5.00

3N

W

3

3

1-Telford-Lapaine

7-Alexander-Pinkney

17
Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

990

 

5.00

0.00

6N

S

6

3

1-Telford-Lapaine

7-Alexander-Pinkney

460

 

3.00

2.00

3N

S

5

8

5-Rogers-Lalor

3-Wolfe-Phillips

460

 

3.00

2.00

3N

S

5

3

4-Simpson-Thomas

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

460

 

3.00

2.00

3N

N

5

4

12-Moore-Duncan

6-Logel-Jameson

210

 

1.00

4.00

2N

N

5

4

2-Morris-Cox

10-King-Evans

 

50

0.00

5.00

6N

S

-1

2

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

11-Teall-Teall

18
Dlr: East 
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

620

 

5.00

0.00

5

S

6

3

2-Morris-Cox

10-King-Evans

180

 

4.00

1.00

2N

N

4

5

5-Rogers-Lalor

3-Wolfe-Phillips

170

 

3.00

2.00

4

N

6

K

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

11-Teall-Teall

150

 

1.00

4.00

3

N

5

K

1-Telford-Lapaine

7-Alexander-Pinkney

150

 

1.00

4.00

3

N

5

K

4-Simpson-Thomas

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

150

 

1.00

4.00

3

N

5

K

12-Moore-Duncan

6-Logel-Jameson

19
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

400

 

5.00

0.00

3N

N

3

6

10-King-Evans

3-Wolfe-Phillips

140

 

4.00

1.00

2

N

3

6

11-Teall-Teall

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

 

50

2.50

2.50

2

S

-1

4

5-Rogers-Lalor

1-Telford-Lapaine

 

50

2.50

2.50

2

S

-1

4

12-Moore-Duncan

7-Alexander-Pinkney

 

100

0.50

4.50

2

S

-2

4

6-Logel-Jameson

4-Simpson-Thomas

 

100

0.50

4.50

2

S

-2

4

2-Morris-Cox

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

20
Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

300

 

5.00

0.00

3

W

-3

4

2-Morris-Cox

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

200

 

4.00

1.00

3

W

-2

4

12-Moore-Duncan

7-Alexander-Pinkney

170

 

3.00

2.00

2

S

4

K

11-Teall-Teall

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

140

 

2.00

3.00

2

S

3

9

10-King-Evans

3-Wolfe-Phillips

110

 

0.50

4.50

2

S

2

6

6-Logel-Jameson

4-Simpson-Thomas

110

 

0.50

4.50

2

S

2

6

5-Rogers-Lalor

1-Telford-Lapaine

21
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

 

200

4.00

1.00

2

E

5

3

6-Logel-Jameson

4-Simpson-Thomas

 

200

4.00

1.00

2

E

5

A

10-King-Evans

3-Wolfe-Phillips

 

200

4.00

1.00

2

E

5

A

11-Teall-Teall

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

 

450

1.00

4.00

4

E

5

3

2-Morris-Cox

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

 

450

1.00

4.00

4

E

5

A

5-Rogers-Lalor

1-Telford-Lapaine

 

450

1.00

4.00

4

E

5

A

12-Moore-Duncan

7-Alexander-Pinkney

22
Dlr: East 
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

150

 

5.00

0.00

1N

N

3

Q

10-King-Evans

4-Simpson-Thomas

120

 

3.50

1.50

1N

N

2

7

6-Logel-Jameson

2-Morris-Cox

120

 

3.50

1.50

1N

N

2

7

11-Teall-Teall

1-Telford-Lapaine

 

50

2.00

3.00

2N

N

-1

2

12-Moore-Duncan

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

 

140

1.00

4.00

2

W

3

A

7-Alexander-Pinkney

5-Rogers-Lalor

 

150

0.00

5.00

2N

N

-3

7

3-Wolfe-Phillips

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

23
Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

650

 

5.00

0.00

4

S

5

J

7-Alexander-Pinkney

5-Rogers-Lalor

200

 

3.50

1.50

2

W

-2

6

3-Wolfe-Phillips

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

200

 

3.50

1.50

2

W

-2

A

12-Moore-Duncan

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

120

 

2.00

3.00

2N

N

2

5

10-King-Evans

4-Simpson-Thomas

100

 

1.00

4.00

2

W

-1

J

11-Teall-Teall

1-Telford-Lapaine

 

100

0.00

5.00

3

N

-1

J

6-Logel-Jameson

2-Morris-Cox

24
Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

170

 

5.00

0.00

2

N

6

3

11-Teall-Teall

1-Telford-Lapaine

140

 

4.00

1.00

3

N

3

A

7-Alexander-Pinkney

5-Rogers-Lalor

130

 

2.50

2.50

3

S

4

10

3-Wolfe-Phillips

9-Zimmerman-Archbold

130

 

2.50

2.50

2

N

4

A

10-King-Evans

4-Simpson-Thomas

100

 

1.00

4.00

4

W

-2

A

6-Logel-Jameson

2-Morris-Cox

 

140

0.00

5.00

3

W

3

A

12-Moore-Duncan

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

25
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

420

 

4.30

0.70

4

S

4

8

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

6-Logel-Jameson

420

 

4.30

0.70

4

S

4

9

4-Simpson-Thomas

1-Telford-Lapaine

170

 

2.50

2.50

2

S

4

A

2-Morris-Cox

11-Teall-Teall

140

 

1.30

3.70

2

S

3

9

5-Rogers-Lalor

10-King-Evans

 

50

0.10

4.90

4

S

-1

3

7-Alexander-Pinkney

3-Wolfe-Phillips

26
Dlr: East 
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

300

 

4.90

0.10

2

W

-3

A

7-Alexander-Pinkney

3-Wolfe-Phillips

200

 

3.10

1.90

3

S

5

6

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

6-Logel-Jameson

200

 

3.10

1.90

2

S

5

6

5-Rogers-Lalor

10-King-Evans

170

 

1.30

3.70

2

S

4

6

2-Morris-Cox

11-Teall-Teall

 

90

0.10

4.90

2

E

2

3

4-Simpson-Thomas

1-Telford-Lapaine

27
Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

N-S

E-W

450

 

4.90

0.10

4

N

5

A

8-Scotchmer-Bloch

6-Logel-Jameson

170

 

3.10

1.90

2

N

4

8

7-Alexander-Pinkney

3-Wolfe-Phillips

170

 

3.10

1.90

2

N

4

4

5-Rogers-Lalor

10-King-Evans

150

 

1.30

3.70

1N

N

3

4

2-Morris-Cox

11-Teall-Teall

 

100

0.10

4.90

3N

N

-2

5

4-Simpson-Thomas

1-Telford-Lapaine