Bridge Results

Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!

Goderich Duplicate Bridge Club
1:00 ♦ Club Championship
Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Photo Gallery of Winners

Event: Tuesday Pairs	Session: Tuesday Aft	Movement: MITCHELL
Date: March 15, 2016	Rating: Club Championship	Section: A
Club No: 131474	Club: Goderich Bridge Club	Dir: David Deaves
MP Limits: None/200/50	Average: 84	Top: 6

Field strength: Mean: 266 MP
Geomean: 73 MP
(based on 30 players)

Both Directions Grouped - Pairs in strats: A=15 / B=9 / C=3

Split by Direction

Overall

Section

A

B

C

A

B

C

Eleanor Erskine

E-W

1

A

1

1

109.74

2.63

N-S

5

A

2

1

100.91

1.97

E-W

7

C

3

1

-

2

1

-

98.03

1.48

Sandra Florence

N-S

7

C

4

2

-

2

1

-

91.50

1.11

N-S

2

A

5

3

89.44

0.83

Joyce Zimmerman

E-W

6

B

-

3

3

2

89.16

0.52

N-S

4

A

-

-

86.85

E-W

4

B

-

4

-

-

84.55

0.39

N-S

8

B

-

-

-

-

79.94

N-S

6

A

-

-

79.65

Sharon McClenaghan

E-W

3

C

-

-

-

-

-

-

77.66

N-S

3

A

-

-

71.84

Mary Lynne Telford

N-S

1

B

-

-

-

-

71.47

E-W

2

B

-

-

-

-

70.84

Robert McFarlane

Rose Ann Morris

E-W

5

B

-

-

-

-

57.96

15 pairs - Pairs in strats: A=15 / B=9 / C=3
Click on a result to see the recap for this pair.

You can move from board to board by using the arrow keys on your keyboard.
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27	28	29	30	31	32

1

Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
50		5.92	0.08					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	110	4.17	1.83					7-Logel-Florence	5-McFarlane-Morris
	110	4.17	1.83					6-Strong-Russell	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	140	1.25	4.75					1-Bloch-Telford	1-Erskine-Archbold
	140	1.25	4.75					8-Dick-Yeats	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
	140	1.25	4.75					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	4-Howe-Lane

2

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
	150	5.92	0.08					7-Logel-Florence	5-McFarlane-Morris
	480	4.17	1.83					1-Bloch-Telford	1-Erskine-Archbold
	480	4.17	1.83					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	4-Howe-Lane
	510	1.25	4.75					8-Dick-Yeats	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
	510	1.25	4.75					6-Strong-Russell	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	510	1.25	4.75					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	6-Zimmerman-Lewington

3

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
1100		5.92	0.08					7-Logel-Florence	5-McFarlane-Morris
140		4.75	1.25					6-Strong-Russell	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
120		3.58	2.42					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
90		2.42	3.58					1-Bloch-Telford	1-Erskine-Archbold
	50	1.25	4.75					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	4-Howe-Lane
	150	0.08	5.92					8-Dick-Yeats	7-Thompson-Scotchmer

4

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
	110	5.92	0.08					6-Strong-Russell	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	150	4.17	1.83					7-Logel-Florence	5-McFarlane-Morris
	150	4.17	1.83					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	4-Howe-Lane
	200	1.83	4.17					8-Dick-Yeats	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
	200	1.83	4.17					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	600	0.08	5.92					1-Bloch-Telford	1-Erskine-Archbold

5

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
500		5.92	0.08					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	5-McFarlane-Morris
90		4.75	1.25					6-Strong-Russell	1-Erskine-Archbold
50		3.58	2.42	2♠	W	-3	♣A	2-Rogers-King	2-Peters-Ross
	200	1.25	4.75					8-Dick-Yeats	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	200	1.25	4.75					7-Logel-Florence	4-Howe-Lane
	200	1.25	4.75					5-Deaves-Deaves	7-Thompson-Scotchmer

6

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
460		5.92	0.08	3N	N	5	♠3	2-Rogers-King	2-Peters-Ross
430		4.75	1.25					5-Deaves-Deaves	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
120		3.58	2.42					8-Dick-Yeats	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
110		2.42	3.58					7-Logel-Florence	4-Howe-Lane
	50	0.67	5.33					6-Strong-Russell	1-Erskine-Archbold
	50	0.67	5.33					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	5-McFarlane-Morris

7

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
500		5.92	0.08					2-Rogers-King	2-Peters-Ross
200		4.75	1.25					7-Logel-Florence	4-Howe-Lane
140		3.58	2.42					5-Deaves-Deaves	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
Pass		2.42	3.58					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	5-McFarlane-Morris
	500	0.67	5.33					8-Dick-Yeats	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	500	0.67	5.33					6-Strong-Russell	1-Erskine-Archbold

8

Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
	420	5.92	0.08					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	5-McFarlane-Morris
	430	4.75	1.25					8-Dick-Yeats	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	450	1.83	4.17					2-Rogers-King	2-Peters-Ross
	450	1.83	4.17					7-Logel-Florence	4-Howe-Lane
	450	1.83	4.17					6-Strong-Russell	1-Erskine-Archbold
	450	1.83	4.17					5-Deaves-Deaves	7-Thompson-Scotchmer

9

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
1100		5.92	0.08					8-Dick-Yeats	5-McFarlane-Morris
460		4.75	1.25					7-Logel-Florence	2-Peters-Ross
430		1.83	4.17	3N	N	4	♠6	3-Odonnell-Odonnell	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
430		1.83	4.17					2-Rogers-King	1-Erskine-Archbold
430		1.83	4.17					1-Bloch-Telford	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
430		1.83	4.17					5-Deaves-Deaves	6-Zimmerman-Lewington

10

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
130		5.33	0.67					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
130		5.33	0.67					5-Deaves-Deaves	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
110		3.58	2.42					7-Logel-Florence	2-Peters-Ross
Pass		2.42	3.58					8-Dick-Yeats	5-McFarlane-Morris
	150	1.25	4.75					2-Rogers-King	1-Erskine-Archbold
	600	0.08	5.92					1-Bloch-Telford	7-Thompson-Scotchmer

11

Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
400		4.17	1.83					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
400		4.17	1.83					8-Dick-Yeats	5-McFarlane-Morris
400		4.17	1.83					7-Logel-Florence	2-Peters-Ross
400		4.17	1.83					5-Deaves-Deaves	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	50	1.25	4.75					1-Bloch-Telford	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
	150	0.08	5.92					2-Rogers-King	1-Erskine-Archbold

12

Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
690		5.92	0.08					5-Deaves-Deaves	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
680		4.75	1.25					7-Logel-Florence	2-Peters-Ross
650		3.00	3.00					1-Bloch-Telford	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
650		3.00	3.00					8-Dick-Yeats	5-McFarlane-Morris
620		1.25	4.75					2-Rogers-King	1-Erskine-Archbold
	100	0.08	5.92					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	3-McClenaghan-Lalor

13

Dlr: North
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
	150	5.92	0.08					7-Logel-Florence	1-Erskine-Archbold
	180	4.75	1.25					6-Strong-Russell	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
	600	2.42	3.58	3N	E	3	♥J	4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	4-Howe-Lane
	600	2.42	3.58					1-Bloch-Telford	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	600	2.42	3.58					8-Dick-Yeats	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	660	0.08	5.92					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	2-Peters-Ross

14

Dlr: East
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
400		5.92	0.08					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	2-Peters-Ross
150		4.75	1.25					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	4-Howe-Lane
130		3.00	3.00					1-Bloch-Telford	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
130		3.00	3.00					7-Logel-Florence	1-Erskine-Archbold
	100	1.25	4.75					8-Dick-Yeats	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	150	0.08	5.92					6-Strong-Russell	7-Thompson-Scotchmer

15

Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
650		4.75	1.25					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	4-Howe-Lane
650		4.75	1.25					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	2-Peters-Ross
650		4.75	1.25					1-Bloch-Telford	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
620		1.83	4.17					8-Dick-Yeats	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
620		1.83	4.17					7-Logel-Florence	1-Erskine-Archbold
	100	0.08	5.92					6-Strong-Russell	7-Thompson-Scotchmer

16

Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
200		5.92	0.08					8-Dick-Yeats	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	170	4.17	1.83					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	4-Howe-Lane
	170	4.17	1.83					1-Bloch-Telford	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	200	2.42	3.58					7-Logel-Florence	1-Erskine-Archbold
	630	1.25	4.75					6-Strong-Russell	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
	660	0.08	5.92					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	2-Peters-Ross

17

Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
150		5.92	0.08					5-Deaves-Deaves	5-McFarlane-Morris
	100	4.17	1.83					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	100	4.17	1.83					1-Bloch-Telford	4-Howe-Lane
	110	2.42	3.58					2-Rogers-King	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
	170	1.25	4.75					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	1-Erskine-Archbold
	250	0.08	5.92					8-Dick-Yeats	2-Peters-Ross

18

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
620		5.92	0.08					5-Deaves-Deaves	5-McFarlane-Morris
150		4.75	1.25					8-Dick-Yeats	2-Peters-Ross
110		3.58	2.42					2-Rogers-King	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
50		2.42	3.58					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	1-Erskine-Archbold
	100	1.25	4.75					1-Bloch-Telford	4-Howe-Lane
	200	0.08	5.92					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	3-McClenaghan-Lalor

19

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
800		5.92	0.08					8-Dick-Yeats	2-Peters-Ross
170		4.75	1.25					2-Rogers-King	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
140		3.58	2.42					5-Deaves-Deaves	5-McFarlane-Morris
110		1.83	4.17					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
110		1.83	4.17					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	1-Erskine-Archbold
	170	0.08	5.92					1-Bloch-Telford	4-Howe-Lane

20

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
200		5.33	0.67					5-Deaves-Deaves	5-McFarlane-Morris
200		5.33	0.67					2-Rogers-King	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
100		3.58	2.42					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	100	2.42	3.58					8-Dick-Yeats	2-Peters-Ross
	120	1.25	4.75					1-Bloch-Telford	4-Howe-Lane
	150	0.08	5.92					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	1-Erskine-Archbold

21

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
630		5.92	0.08					1-Bloch-Telford	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
600		4.17	1.83					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	2-Peters-Ross
600		4.17	1.83					8-Dick-Yeats	1-Erskine-Archbold
150		2.42	3.58					5-Deaves-Deaves	4-Howe-Lane
130		1.25	4.75					2-Rogers-King	5-McFarlane-Morris
120		0.08	5.92	2N	N	2	♠4	6-Strong-Russell	6-Zimmerman-Lewington

22

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
100		5.33	0.67					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	2-Peters-Ross
100		5.33	0.67					1-Bloch-Telford	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	120	3.58	2.42					2-Rogers-King	5-McFarlane-Morris
	140	2.42	3.58					5-Deaves-Deaves	4-Howe-Lane
	150	0.67	5.33					6-Strong-Russell	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	150	0.67	5.33					8-Dick-Yeats	1-Erskine-Archbold

23

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
Pass		4.17	1.83					6-Strong-Russell	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
Pass		4.17	1.83					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	2-Peters-Ross
Pass		4.17	1.83					1-Bloch-Telford	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
Pass		4.17	1.83					8-Dick-Yeats	1-Erskine-Archbold
	80	0.67	5.33					5-Deaves-Deaves	4-Howe-Lane
	80	0.67	5.33					2-Rogers-King	5-McFarlane-Morris

24

Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
450		4.75	1.25					5-Deaves-Deaves	4-Howe-Lane
450		4.75	1.25					2-Rogers-King	5-McFarlane-Morris
450		4.75	1.25					8-Dick-Yeats	1-Erskine-Archbold
420		2.42	3.58					6-Strong-Russell	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
100		0.67	5.33					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	2-Peters-Ross
100		0.67	5.33					1-Bloch-Telford	3-McClenaghan-Lalor

25

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
980		6.00	0.00					5-Deaves-Deaves	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
420		4.50	1.50	4♠	N	4	♦2	7-Logel-Florence	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
420		4.50	1.50					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
400		3.00	3.00					2-Rogers-King	4-Howe-Lane
	50	2.00	4.00					6-Strong-Russell	5-McFarlane-Morris
	100	1.00	5.00					1-Bloch-Telford	2-Peters-Ross
	200	0.00	6.00					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	1-Erskine-Archbold

26

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
100		6.00	0.00					6-Strong-Russell	5-McFarlane-Morris
	1440	2.50	3.50					7-Logel-Florence	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
	1440	2.50	3.50					5-Deaves-Deaves	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	1440	2.50	3.50					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	1-Erskine-Archbold
	1440	2.50	3.50					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	1440	2.50	3.50					2-Rogers-King	4-Howe-Lane
	1440	2.50	3.50					1-Bloch-Telford	2-Peters-Ross

27

Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
130		6.00	0.00					6-Strong-Russell	5-McFarlane-Morris
110		5.00	1.00					7-Logel-Florence	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
50		4.00	2.00					2-Rogers-King	4-Howe-Lane
	50	3.00	3.00					5-Deaves-Deaves	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	100	1.50	4.50					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	100	1.50	4.50					1-Bloch-Telford	2-Peters-Ross
	110	0.00	6.00					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	1-Erskine-Archbold

28

Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
200		6.00	0.00					2-Rogers-King	4-Howe-Lane
100		5.00	1.00					1-Bloch-Telford	2-Peters-Ross
50		3.00	3.00					6-Strong-Russell	5-McFarlane-Morris
50		3.00	3.00					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	1-Erskine-Archbold
50		3.00	3.00					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	100	1.00	5.00					5-Deaves-Deaves	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	140	0.00	6.00					7-Logel-Florence	7-Thompson-Scotchmer

29

Dlr: North
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
200		5.92	0.08					6-Strong-Russell	4-Howe-Lane
100		3.58	2.42					5-Deaves-Deaves	2-Peters-Ross
100		3.58	2.42					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
100		3.58	2.42					2-Rogers-King	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	110	0.67	5.33					7-Logel-Florence	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	110	0.67	5.33					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	5-McFarlane-Morris

30

Dlr: East
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
130		5.33	0.67					5-Deaves-Deaves	2-Peters-Ross
130		5.33	0.67					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
110		3.00	3.00					6-Strong-Russell	4-Howe-Lane
110		3.00	3.00					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	5-McFarlane-Morris
50		1.25	4.75					2-Rogers-King	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	50	0.08	5.92					7-Logel-Florence	6-Zimmerman-Lewington

31

Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
50		5.92	0.08					2-Rogers-King	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	200	4.75	1.25					7-Logel-Florence	6-Zimmerman-Lewington
	420	2.42	3.58					6-Strong-Russell	4-Howe-Lane
	420	2.42	3.58					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
	420	2.42	3.58					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	5-McFarlane-Morris
	480	0.08	5.92					5-Deaves-Deaves	2-Peters-Ross

32

Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	N-S	E-W
400		5.33	0.67					5-Deaves-Deaves	2-Peters-Ross
400		5.33	0.67					3-Odonnell-Odonnell	5-McFarlane-Morris
150		2.42	3.58					6-Strong-Russell	4-Howe-Lane
150		2.42	3.58					4-Lapaine-Lounsbury	7-Thompson-Scotchmer
150		2.42	3.58					2-Rogers-King	3-McClenaghan-Lalor
	100	0.08	5.92					7-Logel-Florence	6-Zimmerman-Lewington