| 1 |
♠Q93
♥A4
♦KJ6
♣KQ763
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
♠KJT5
♥J75
♦AQ75
♣A9
|
♠74
♥Q986
♦942
♣JT82
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣4/5 ♦5/6 ♥5/6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 1.00 2N N 2 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
120 4.00 1.00 2N N 2 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 4-Poh-Fisher
120 4.00 1.00 2N N 2 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
50 1.50 3.50 1N N -1 6-Husted-Moore vs 5-Morgan-Meade
50 1.50 3.50 2♣ N -1 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
100 0.00 5.00 2N N -2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
|
| 2 |
♠862
♥QJ8
♦KT8
♣AT32
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQ54
♥K953
♦J3
♣K87
|
♠A93
♥64
♦7542
♣J965
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 5.00 0.00 1♦** S 2 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
120 3.50 1.50 1N N 2 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 4-Poh-Fisher
120 3.50 1.50 1N N 2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ S 2 6-Husted-Moore vs 5-Morgan-Meade
90 1.00 4.00 2♣ E 2 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
300 0.00 5.00 2♣ S -3 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
|
| 3 |
♠-
♥K543
♦T972
♣AJT97
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q8732
♥Q92
♦AJ
♣Q43
|
♠J9
♥AJ86
♦K8643
♣K6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4/3 ♥3/4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: -/1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2/3♠ 3NT
♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 2N W -2 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 4-Poh-Fisher
120 3.50 1.50 2N W 2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
120 3.50 1.50 1N E 2 6-Husted-Moore vs 5-Morgan-Meade
150 2.00 3.00 2♠ S -3 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
200 1.00 4.00 2♠ S -4 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
500 0.00 5.00 2♠* S -3 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
|
| 4 |
♠K42
♥Q4
♦KQT863
♣KT
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ87
♥3
♦AJ9742
♣54
|
♠J6
♥AT876
♦5
♣AQ976
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 1.00 3N E -2 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
200 4.00 1.00 2N E -2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
200 4.00 1.00 3♣ W -2 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
100 1.50 3.50 3N W -1 6-Husted-Moore vs 5-Morgan-Meade
100 1.50 3.50 2N E -1 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 4-Poh-Fisher
110 0.00 5.00 2♦ W 3 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
|
| 5 |
♠2
♥J86
♦752
♣Q97654
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ764
♥Q93
♦Q63
♣A2
|
♠83
♥K72
♦AT98
♣JT83
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT5/6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
80 4.00 1.00 1♠ S 1 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
80 4.00 1.00 1♠ S 1 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
80 4.00 1.00 1♠ S 1 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
200 1.00 4.00 2♠ S -2 6-Husted-Moore vs 4-Poh-Fisher
200 1.00 4.00 1♠ S -2 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
200 1.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 5-Morgan-Meade
|
| 6 |
♠A9
♥T5
♦QT9
♣A87432
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J72
♥4
♦KJ763
♣QJ95
|
♠KQ86
♥AQJ73
♦A2
♣KT
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4/3 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
100 4.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ E 2 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
600 2.00 3.00 3N W 3 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 5-Morgan-Meade
630 0.50 4.50 3N W 4 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
630 0.50 4.50 3N W 4 6-Husted-Moore vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
| 7 |
♠KJT86
♥J4
♦T976
♣T7
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
♠A52
♥KQT53
♦KJ2
♣K4
|
♠93
♥976
♦A3
♣AQ9832
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
| EW: 6♣ 2♦ 6♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 6-Husted-Moore vs 4-Poh-Fisher
150 4.00 1.00 3♣ W 5 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
600 2.50 2.50 3N W 3 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
600 2.50 2.50 3N W 3 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 5-Morgan-Meade
620 0.50 4.50 4♥ W 4 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
620 0.50 4.50 4♥ W 4 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
|
| 8 |
♠76
♥86
♦82
♣QT96532
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
♠94
♥QJ4
♦AK97
♣AKJ8
|
♠QJ5
♥AT732
♦Q64
♣74
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4/3♥ 1/-♠ 2NT
♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 1.00 3N E -2 6-Husted-Moore vs 4-Poh-Fisher
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
100 4.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 5-Morgan-Meade
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
|
| 9 |
♠85
♥QT942
♦9764
♣92
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT32
♥83
♦AK52
♣AJT
|
♠AJ9764
♥A5
♦T3
♣K74
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 5-Morgan-Meade
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 6-Husted-Moore vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
680 0.50 4.50 4♠ E 6 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
680 0.50 4.50 4♠ E 6 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
| 10 |
♠KJT6
♥AT765
♦Q8
♣82
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ843
♥Q32
♦97
♣QJ7
|
♠75
♥J4
♦JT642
♣AK94
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 3N W -4 6-Husted-Moore vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ N 3 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
140 3.50 1.50 2♥ N 3 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 4-Poh-Fisher
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ N 2 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 5-Morgan-Meade
90 0.50 4.50 1N E 1 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
90 0.50 4.50 1N E 1 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
|
| 11 |
♠T82
♥6
♦T97643
♣Q82
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
♠J543
♥AKQ73
♦5
♣J95
|
♠A97
♥942
♦AJ8
♣K763
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥4/5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2/1♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 4-Poh-Fisher
100 4.00 1.00 3♦ N -2 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 5-Morgan-Meade
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 6-Husted-Moore vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
150 1.00 4.00 4♦ N -3 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
170 0.00 5.00 3♥ W 4 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
|
| 12 |
♠QT53
♥AT872
♦Q64
♣T
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J72
♥54
♦T2
♣AKJ764
|
♠K6
♥K9
♦AKJ9853
♣95
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 5NT ♥4 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 3N E -3 6-Husted-Moore vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
100 4.00 1.00 4♣ W -2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 4-Poh-Fisher
50 3.00 2.00 3♣ W -1 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
110 2.00 3.00 3♦ E 3 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 5-Morgan-Meade
130 1.00 4.00 3♦ E 4 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
150 0.00 5.00 3♦ E 5 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
|
| 13 |
♠9
♥AK965
♦T8
♣AT983
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT64
♥-
♦KQ9754
♣652
|
♠AKJ872
♥73
♦2
♣QJ74
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♠2 |
| EW: 1♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 1.00 5♥ N 5 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 4-Poh-Fisher
650 4.00 1.00 5♥ N 5 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
650 4.00 1.00 5♥ N 5 6-Husted-Moore vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
200 2.00 3.00 5♠ E -2 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 5-Morgan-Meade
620 1.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
650 0.00 5.00 5♠ E 5 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
|
| 14 |
♠AKJT
♥A82
♦AT632
♣6
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
♠Q9642
♥95
♦KQ987
♣7
|
♠85
♥KQJ43
♦J
♣KJT84
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3N E -4 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 5-Morgan-Meade
150 4.00 1.00 2♥ E -3 6-Husted-Moore vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
100 3.00 2.00 3N W -2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ N 2 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
50 1.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
100 0.00 5.00 3♣ S -2 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
| 15 |
♠AJ84
♥AJ82
♦KJ3
♣74
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KT9
♥KT543
♦AT92
♣6
|
♠Q653
♥Q
♦Q74
♣AQT95
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
100 4.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
50 3.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 4-Poh-Fisher
120 2.00 3.00 2N W 2 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
140 1.00 4.00 1♠ E 3 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 5-Morgan-Meade
200 0.00 5.00 1♠ N -2 6-Husted-Moore vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
|
| 16 |
♠QT7
♥Q7653
♦K2
♣T43
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠9542
♥A8
♦JT953
♣Q7
|
♠863
♥KT942
♦AQ84
♣2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 5.00 0.00 3N N 5 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
210 4.00 1.00 2N N 5 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ S 4 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 4-Poh-Fisher
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ S 4 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 5-Morgan-Meade
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ S 4 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
130 1.50 3.50 2♣ S 4 6-Husted-Moore vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
|
| 17 |
♠J43
♥JT9
♦K4
♣A7632
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
♠T862
♥3
♦QJT65
♣K98
|
♠Q9
♥AKQ
♦A9732
♣QT5
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 2♣ N -1 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
90 3.50 1.50 1N E 1 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 4-Poh-Fisher
90 3.50 1.50 1N E 1 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 5-Morgan-Meade
120 2.00 3.00 1N E 2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
130 1.00 4.00 4♦ E 4 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
150 0.00 5.00 1N E 3 6-Husted-Moore vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
|
| 18 |
♠AK65
♥QT95
♦932
♣J4
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J84
♥K43
♦AT6
♣AQ73
|
♠932
♥J87
♦KQ7
♣KT85
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 6-Husted-Moore vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
90 3.50 1.50 1N E 1 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 4-Poh-Fisher
90 3.50 1.50 2♣ W 2 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 5-Morgan-Meade
120 2.00 3.00 2N E 2 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
150 1.00 4.00 1N E 3 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
200 0.00 5.00 2♦ S -2 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
|
| 19 |
♠-
♥QT97
♦QJ732
♣QT82
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q874
♥J82
♦A64
♣A94
|
♠J3
♥K643
♦T8
♣KJ765
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.50 1.50 3♠ S 3 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S 3 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S 3 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 5-Morgan-Meade
140 3.50 1.50 1♠ S 3 6-Husted-Moore vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
50 1.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
100 0.00 5.00 3♠ S -2 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
| 20 |
♠Q953
♥93
♦9762
♣872
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
♠K64
♥AK876
♦QJ85
♣K
|
♠T87
♥T2
♦A4
♣AQJ653
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3/4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5/4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ W 3 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 5-Morgan-Meade
150 3.00 2.00 3♣ E 5 6-Husted-Moore vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
660 1.00 4.00 3N W 5 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
660 1.00 4.00 3N W 5 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
660 1.00 4.00 3N E 5 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 4-Poh-Fisher
|
| 21 |
♠T5
♥AQJ75
♦AK876
♣4
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q96
♥T862
♦QT9
♣J65
|
♠J842
♥K43
♦2
♣KQ873
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♣ 6♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.50 0.50 3N S 4 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 5-Morgan-Meade
630 4.50 0.50 3N S 4 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 4-Poh-Fisher
170 3.00 2.00 4♦ N 6 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
130 2.00 3.00 4♦ N 4 6-Husted-Moore vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
100 1.00 4.00 3N N -1 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
200 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -2 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
|
| 22 |
♠K86
♥K732
♦7
♣K9854
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT43
♥4
♦JT865
♣A72
|
♠QJ92
♥QT865
♦K93
♣6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 1N S 3 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
130 3.50 1.50 2♣ S 4 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
130 3.50 1.50 2♣ N 4 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
110 1.50 3.50 2♥ N 2 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 5-Morgan-Meade
110 1.50 3.50 2♥ N 2 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 4-Poh-Fisher
150 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -3 6-Husted-Moore vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
|
| 23 |
♠AKT743
♥K53
♦952
♣4
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
♠65
♥Q72
♦T743
♣KJ85
|
♠J
♥AJT6
♦AKQ86
♣A73
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 1.00 4♣ W -1 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
100 4.00 1.00 4♣ W -1 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 4-Poh-Fisher
100 4.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 6-Husted-Moore vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
150 2.00 3.00 3♦ E 5 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 5-Morgan-Meade
200 1.00 4.00 3♠* N -1 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
620 0.00 5.00 5♦ E 6 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
|
| 24 |
♠AJT
♥AK4
♦J76
♣QT92
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ4
♥QT5
♦982
♣AKJ5
|
♠985
♥98763
♦3
♣8764
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ -/1♥ 4♠ 4NT ♥6/7 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 5.00 0.00 3N N 4 5-Knight-Chisholm vs 4-Poh-Fisher
210 4.00 1.00 2N N 5 1-Sokolik-Sokolik vs 2-Blacksmith-Blanchard
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ S 5 3-Pillans-Attebury vs 5-Morgan-Meade
130 2.00 3.00 4♦ S 4 4-Parrott-Parrott vs 1-Rottschaefer-Rottschaefer
50 1.00 4.00 2♥ W -1 2-Starnes-Campbell vs 3-Martinez-Horesh
110 0.00 5.00 2♥ W 2 6-Husted-Moore vs 6-Abbott-Faulkner
|
