| 1 |
♠J3
♥A75
♦54
♣JT9765
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
♠6542
♥KT2
♦T8632
♣8
|
♠KQT8
♥J863
♦KJ7
♣Q2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 6-Zahler-Allen vs 1-Kenny-Kenny
180 1.00 1.00 1N S 4 2-Welles-Racine vs 4-Lawrence-Allen
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
|
| 2 |
♠8
♥KT
♦AK95432
♣A83
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K7542
♥873
♦J
♣9654
|
♠AJT
♥J9654
♦QT
♣KJ7
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥6 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 2.00 0.00 3N S 6 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
620 1.00 1.00 5♦ N 6 2-Welles-Racine vs 4-Lawrence-Allen
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ N 5 6-Zahler-Allen vs 1-Kenny-Kenny
|
| 3 |
♠93
♥62
♦AJ8764
♣K83
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠6
♥AK4
♦K52
♣QT7642
|
♠J8754
♥983
♦T3
♣AJ9
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/2♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 2 6-Zahler-Allen vs 1-Kenny-Kenny
150 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -3 2-Welles-Racine vs 4-Lawrence-Allen
|
| 4 |
♠Q
♥KT83
♦K76
♣AQ543
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
♠A4
♥AJ9652
♦Q5
♣T72
|
♠T87632
♥4
♦T4
♣K986
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 4-Lawrence-Allen
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 1-Kenny-Kenny
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 2-Welles-Racine
|
| 5 |
♠T976
♥632
♦QJT42
♣3
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK84
♥AQ85
♦7
♣AT64
|
♠Q52
♥J97
♦AK86
♣Q52
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 5/4♣ 4/3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 1♣ W 2 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 1-Kenny-Kenny
460 0.50 1.50 3N W 5 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 4-Lawrence-Allen
460 0.50 1.50 3N E 5 6-Zahler-Allen vs 2-Welles-Racine
|
| 6 |
♠543
♥AKQ8
♦43
♣KQ95
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQJ72
♥J76
♦AQ9
♣42
|
♠96
♥T93
♦JT875
♣A76
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 6-Zahler-Allen vs 2-Welles-Racine
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ W 1 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 1-Kenny-Kenny
170 0.00 2.00 1♠ W 4 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 4-Lawrence-Allen
|
| 7 |
♠K873
♥T74
♦763
♣A98
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
♠A94
♥Q32
♦KQJ42
♣T5
|
♠T62
♥95
♦T5
♣KQJ642
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6/7 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 1-Kenny-Kenny vs 2-Welles-Racine
100 0.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 4-Lawrence-Allen vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
|
| 8 |
♠T7
♥Q865
♦AJ754
♣Q7
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ2
♥AK4
♦KT82
♣K63
|
♠Q9864
♥JT93
♦Q63
♣5
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/3♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ E 3 1-Kenny-Kenny vs 2-Welles-Racine
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ E 3 4-Lawrence-Allen vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
400 0.00 2.00 3N W 3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|
| 9 |
♠KT3
♥876
♦QJ76
♣A62
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJ74
♥K52
♦9854
♣Q5
|
♠9852
♥AJ43
♦2
♣JT84
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 2.00 0.00 2N N 4 4-Lawrence-Allen vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 1-Kenny-Kenny vs 2-Welles-Racine
100 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -2 6-Zahler-Allen vs 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|
| 10 |
♠AK
♥K975
♦JT32
♣865
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
♠J7
♥AJ3
♦AKQ97
♣KT4
|
♠QT62
♥T64
♦5
♣AQ932
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 2.00 0.00 1N W 4 1-Kenny-Kenny vs 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle
630 1.00 1.00 3N W 4 6-Zahler-Allen vs 4-Lawrence-Allen
660 0.00 2.00 3N W 5 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 2-Welles-Racine
|
| 11 |
♠62
♥QT7653
♦KQ6
♣42
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
♠AQJ8
♥A92
♦J7
♣AK98
|
♠953
♥8
♦A984
♣Q7653
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥6 ♠1 NT2/3 |
| EW: 6♣ 3♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ W 3 1-Kenny-Kenny vs 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ E 3 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 2-Welles-Racine
460 0.00 2.00 3N W 5 6-Zahler-Allen vs 4-Lawrence-Allen
|
| 12 |
♠T754
♥K853
♦AK3
♣Q8
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ86
♥AQ4
♦Q6
♣J532
|
♠AQ3
♥T9
♦JT42
♣K976
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4/5 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1/2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 1N E 1 6-Zahler-Allen vs 4-Lawrence-Allen
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 2 1-Kenny-Kenny vs 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle
400 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 2-Welles-Racine
|
| 13 |
♠AT43
♥8543
♦7
♣Q874
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ96
♥A
♦AKT9432
♣T
|
♠Q52
♥KJ97
♦6
♣AKJ53
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 4-Lawrence-Allen vs 1-Kenny-Kenny
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ W 4 6-Zahler-Allen vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
660 0.00 2.00 3N E 5 2-Welles-Racine vs 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|
| 14 |
♠KT4
♥AJT4
♦A4
♣Q532
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
♠A3
♥9853
♦J95
♣AJT8
|
♠J852
♥K
♦KQT732
♣96
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 2♠ S -1 2-Welles-Racine vs 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ N -1 6-Zahler-Allen vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ E 3 4-Lawrence-Allen vs 1-Kenny-Kenny
|
| 15 |
♠A6
♥AKQ
♦Q9863
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K9532
♥9764
♦AJ4
♣4
|
♠QJT8
♥J82
♦K2
♣A987
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1/2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 1♦ N 3 4-Lawrence-Allen vs 1-Kenny-Kenny
90 0.50 1.50 1♦ N 2 2-Welles-Racine vs 3-Macbeth-Sponaugle
90 0.50 1.50 1♦ N 2 6-Zahler-Allen vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
|