| 1 |
♠T98
♥T62
♦A87
♣Q742
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
♠Q4
♥KJ954
♦KJT93
♣8
|
♠AJ53
♥3
♦642
♣AKJ96
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3/2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 6-Zahler-Allen vs 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle
110 0.50 1.50 1♥ W 2 2-Welles-Racine vs 4-Lawrence-Hill
110 0.50 1.50 2♦ W 3 3-Randall-Randall vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
|
| 2 |
♠AT
♥Q982
♦J2
♣QT752
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9532
♥A43
♦876
♣AK8
|
♠K8764
♥75
♦KT54
♣94
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4/3 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 4 3-Randall-Randall vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 2-Welles-Racine vs 4-Lawrence-Hill
300 0.00 2.00 3N S -3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|
| 3 |
♠J9875
♥QJ4
♦K874
♣8
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK62
♥32
♦Q5
♣AT763
|
♠Q3
♥AT5
♦AT632
♣K92
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2/1♥ 3/2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 1N E 1 2-Welles-Racine vs 4-Lawrence-Hill
130 1.00 1.00 2♣ W 4 3-Randall-Randall vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
600 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|
| 4 |
♠9652
♥2
♦QJ85
♣K943
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKQJ
♥JT975
♦K92
♣T
|
♠T874
♥AQ63
♦74
♣Q87
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠4 |
| EW: 3♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 3-Randall-Randall vs 4-Lawrence-Hill
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ W 3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 2-Welles-Racine
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ W 3 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|
| 5 |
♠Q2
♥Q863
♦QT7
♣KQT4
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J85
♥J9
♦A86
♣J8753
|
♠A4
♥AK52
♦KJ943
♣A2
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 4/5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 1N W -1 3-Randall-Randall vs 4-Lawrence-Hill
150 1.00 1.00 1N E 3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 2-Welles-Racine
430 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|
| 6 |
♠94
♥Q6
♦A84
♣KT9863
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A52
♥J954
♦652
♣J42
|
♠JT763
♥A87
♦KJT
♣75
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.00 0.00 3N S 4 3-Randall-Randall vs 4-Lawrence-Hill
150 1.00 1.00 2N S 3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 2-Welles-Racine
120 0.00 2.00 1N S 2 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|
| 7 |
♠J986
♥AQ6
♦QJT84
♣3
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKQT7
♥J87
♦A
♣QJ52
|
♠52
♥K93
♦K976
♣AK94
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 0.00 3N W 3 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 2-Welles-Racine
660 0.50 1.50 3N W 5 4-Lawrence-Hill vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
660 0.50 1.50 3N E 5 6-Zahler-Allen vs 3-Randall-Randall
|
| 8 |
♠J654
♥KQ5432
♦J
♣Q2
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
♠T7
♥AT
♦K962
♣J8743
|
♠Q983
♥J9
♦AT7
♣K965
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 4/3♥ 2♠ 3/2NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 5 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 2-Welles-Racine
140 1.00 1.00 1♥ N 3 4-Lawrence-Hill vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ N 2 6-Zahler-Allen vs 3-Randall-Randall
|
| 9 |
♠A54
♥JT983
♦5
♣A762
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J9763
♥Q72
♦AJ84
♣J
|
♠82
♥AK54
♦QT973
♣T4
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ ♦3 ♥5/6 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 1.50 0.50 2N S 3 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 2-Welles-Racine
150 1.50 0.50 2♣ S 5 4-Lawrence-Hill vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ S 3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 3-Randall-Randall
|
| 10 |
♠AT53
♥KQJ
♦K7
♣KT93
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
♠K62
♥75432
♦53
♣A64
|
♠QJ84
♥T8
♦Q8
♣QJ872
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/-♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2♠ 5NT ♣7/6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥4 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 0.00 5♦ S 5 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 3-Randall-Randall
150 0.50 1.50 2♦ S 5 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 2-Welles-Racine
150 0.50 1.50 1♦ S 5 6-Zahler-Allen vs 4-Lawrence-Hill
|
| 11 |
♠73
♥J742
♦K953
♣742
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ
♥KQ3
♦JT7
♣AT863
|
♠A9842
♥T86
♦A4
♣K95
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1/-♦ 2/1♥ 3♠ 4/3NT
♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.50 0.50 3♣ W 3 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 2-Welles-Racine
110 1.50 0.50 2♣ W 3 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 3-Randall-Randall
360 0.00 2.00 1♠* E 3 6-Zahler-Allen vs 4-Lawrence-Hill
|
| 12 |
♠AQJ5
♥9
♦AQ863
♣K76
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠943
♥J4
♦T72
♣QT953
|
♠K62
♥AK8763
♦9
♣A84
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 6-Zahler-Allen vs 4-Lawrence-Hill
50 0.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle vs 3-Randall-Randall
50 0.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 5-Swaim-Nickerson vs 2-Welles-Racine
|
| 13 |
♠A4
♥3
♦AKQT874
♣K32
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ762
♥86
♦62
♣QT97
|
♠95
♥AK95
♦953
♣AJ64
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♦ 3/2♥ 4/1NT
♣6/5 ♠6/5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ N 4 6-Zahler-Allen vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
110 0.50 1.50 3♦ N 3 2-Welles-Racine vs 3-Randall-Randall
110 0.50 1.50 3♦ N 3 4-Lawrence-Hill vs 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|
| 14 |
♠KT72
♥QT8
♦87
♣QT73
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
♠A9
♥KJ975
♦KT3
♣A86
|
♠Q864
♥A62
♦AQ52
♣J9
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦2/3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2/3 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 4-Lawrence-Hill vs 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle
460 0.50 1.50 3N W 5 2-Welles-Racine vs 3-Randall-Randall
460 0.50 1.50 3N W 5 6-Zahler-Allen vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
|
| 15 |
♠QJ43
♥A7
♦AQT4
♣T64
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K2
♥KQJ
♦95
♣AKQJ98
|
♠A65
♥T98543
♦J86
♣5
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 1N W 2 6-Zahler-Allen vs 5-Swaim-Nickerson
130 1.00 1.00 4♣ W 4 2-Welles-Racine vs 3-Randall-Randall
450 0.00 2.00 5♥ E 5 4-Lawrence-Hill vs 1-Macbeth-Sponaugle
|