| 1 |
♠AQT754
♥5
♦A3
♣JT63
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣A 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 3-Levinsky-Young
150 2.00 1.00 3N E -3 ♥6 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
50 0.50 2.50 5♥ E -1 ♠9 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♠2 2-Hein-Klump vs 2-Conner-Hatch
|
| 2 |
♠J73
♥AT2
♦K4
♣AJ852
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3/2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 ♣A 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 3-Levinsky-Young
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ E 3 ♣4 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 4 ♠2 2-Hein-Klump vs 2-Conner-Hatch
200 0.00 3.00 2♣ N -2 ♣2 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
|
| 3 |
♠JT2
♥AQ542
♦74
♣QT3
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣5/6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♥ N -1 ♦3 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ W 3 ♣3 2-Hein-Klump vs 2-Conner-Hatch
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ E 3 ♥2 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 3-Levinsky-Young
200 0.00 3.00 3♠ W 5 ♣2 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
|
| 4 |
♠JT96
♥654
♦QT
♣KQ94
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 ♥A 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 3-Levinsky-Young
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 ♦A 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 2-Conner-Hatch
200 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 ♥A 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
400 0.00 3.00 2N S -4 ♥3 2-Hein-Klump vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
|
| 5 |
♠Q87
♥Q3
♦J987
♣QT87
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S 3 ♣3 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 3-Levinsky-Young
120 2.00 1.00 2N S 2 ♣3 2-Hein-Klump vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
50 1.00 2.00 2♣ W -1 ♣7 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 2-Conner-Hatch
100 0.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♥2 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
|
| 6 |
♠JT
♥Q7
♦K9652
♣AKJ9
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 3♣ N 3 ♥A 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 2-Conner-Hatch
110 2.50 0.50 3♣ N 3 ♥3 2-Hein-Klump vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 2 ♦7 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E 3 ♣6 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 3-Levinsky-Young
|
| 7 |
♠A62
♥KJ843
♦QJ
♣A96
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.50 0.50 2N N 2 ♣3 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 2-Conner-Hatch
120 2.50 0.50 1N N 2 ♣3 2-Hein-Klump vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
200 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -2 ♠7 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 3-Levinsky-Young
200 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -2 ♠4 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
|
| 8 |
♠Q87643
♥94
♦T82
♣65
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E 5 ♦6 2-Hein-Klump vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 ♣A 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 2-Conner-Hatch
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 ♣A 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 3-Levinsky-Young
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 ♣A 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
|
| 9 |
♠AKT982
♥KT
♦KT86
♣Q
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 6♦ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦0 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♥A 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 2-Conner-Hatch
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♦3 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
170 1.00 2.00 4♦ N 6 ♣2 2-Hein-Klump vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♦3 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 3-Levinsky-Young
|
| 10 |
♠2
♥K76
♦T6
♣AKJ9862
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♣A 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣4 2-Hein-Klump vs 3-Levinsky-Young
100 2.00 1.00 5♣ N -1 ♠3 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 ♦T 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 2-Conner-Hatch
|
| 11 |
♠Q74
♥AJ73
♦852
♣T93
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥2 1-Palmer-Fridley vs 2-Conner-Hatch
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ E 3 ♥2 2-Hein-Klump vs 3-Levinsky-Young
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♥2 3-McKennon-Breuer vs 4-Cowie-Hawes
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 ♥2 4-Niedner-Osborne vs 1-Heitler-Reynolds
|