| 1 |
♠K83
♥KQJ8
♦KQT
♣643
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 2N S -1 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 4-Houston-Weiland
120 3.00 2.00 1N W 2 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 1-Rothman-Myers
120 3.00 2.00 1N W 2 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 5-Ash-Finkle
120 3.00 2.00 1N W 2 6-Back-Lusby vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
150 0.50 4.50 1N W 3 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
150 0.50 4.50 2♥ N -3 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
|
| 2 |
♠Q72
♥Q6
♦9864
♣QJ73
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 3N W 3 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
430 2.00 3.00 3N W 4 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 1-Rothman-Myers
430 2.00 3.00 3N W 4 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 5-Ash-Finkle
430 2.00 3.00 3N W 4 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
430 2.00 3.00 3N W 4 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 4-Houston-Weiland
430 2.00 3.00 3N W 4 6-Back-Lusby vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
|
| 3 |
♠A6532
♥876
♦8
♣Q986
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥6 NT3 |
| EW: 5/4♦ 1♥ 4NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 6-Back-Lusby vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
150 4.00 1.00 3♦ E 5 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 5-Ash-Finkle
170 2.50 2.50 3♦ E 6 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
170 2.50 2.50 3♦ E 6 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 4-Houston-Weiland
600 1.00 4.00 5♦ E 5 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
660 0.00 5.00 3N E 5 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 1-Rothman-Myers
|
| 4 |
♠Q64
♥Q642
♦KQ943
♣A
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 1N W -2 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
100 4.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 6-Back-Lusby vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
90 3.00 2.00 1N S 1 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 5-Ash-Finkle
80 2.00 3.00 1♥ E 1 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 1-Rothman-Myers
100 1.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 4-Houston-Weiland
200 0.00 5.00 1N S -2 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
|
| 5 |
♠AQ7632
♥862
♦AQ8
♣K
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
100 4.00 1.00 3♣ E -2 6-Back-Lusby vs 5-Ash-Finkle
80 3.00 2.00 1♠ N 1 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
50 2.00 3.00 3♣ E -1 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
100 0.50 4.50 2♠ N -1 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 4-Houston-Weiland
100 0.50 4.50 2♠ N -1 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 1-Rothman-Myers
|
| 6 |
♠84
♥954
♦QJ653
♣A94
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 5.00 0.00 3♥ E 6 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 4-Houston-Weiland
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ E 4 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ E 4 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ E 5 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 1-Rothman-Myers
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ E 5 6-Back-Lusby vs 5-Ash-Finkle
680 0.00 5.00 4♥ E 6 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
|
| 7 |
♠98654
♥7
♦Q965
♣954
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♣ 3/2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -6 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
200 4.00 1.00 2♦ E -2 6-Back-Lusby vs 5-Ash-Finkle
100 3.00 2.00 1N S -1 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 4-Houston-Weiland
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ W 2 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
200 0.50 4.50 2♠ S -2 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
200 0.50 4.50 2♠ S -2 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 1-Rothman-Myers
|
| 8 |
♠972
♥A4
♦J987654
♣J
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 3♠ S 3 6-Back-Lusby vs 5-Ash-Finkle
110 4.00 1.00 3♦ N 3 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 4-Houston-Weiland
100 3.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
50 2.00 3.00 4♥ E -1 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 1-Rothman-Myers
170 0.50 4.50 3♥ E 4 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
170 0.50 4.50 3♥ E 4 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
|
| 9 |
♠A8
♥K732
♦A94
♣A972
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 5.00 0.00 3N N 4 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
420 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ N 4 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 1-Rothman-Myers
130 2.00 3.00 3♣ N 4 6-Back-Lusby vs 4-Houston-Weiland
100 1.00 4.00 3N N -2 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 5-Ash-Finkle
150 0.00 5.00 3N N -3 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
|
| 10 |
♠K65432
♥QT95
♦J85
♣-
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦2 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 5♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 2♦ W 3 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 1-Rothman-Myers
150 2.50 2.50 3♦ W 5 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
150 2.50 2.50 3♦ W 5 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
150 2.50 2.50 2♦ W 5 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 5-Ash-Finkle
150 2.50 2.50 2♦ W 5 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
200 0.00 5.00 3♠ N -2 6-Back-Lusby vs 4-Houston-Weiland
|
| 11 |
♠QJ83
♥J9543
♦AK
♣95
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 5.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
140 4.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
120 3.00 2.00 2N S 2 6-Back-Lusby vs 4-Houston-Weiland
90 2.00 3.00 1N S 1 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 1-Rothman-Myers
50 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
100 0.00 5.00 5♦ S -2 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 5-Ash-Finkle
|
| 12 |
♠J8653
♥T932
♦K85
♣8
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1/2 ♦2 ♥4/6 ♠3 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 3N W 3 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 5-Ash-Finkle
460 2.50 2.50 3N W 5 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 1-Rothman-Myers
460 2.50 2.50 3N W 5 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
460 2.50 2.50 3N E 5 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
460 2.50 2.50 3N E 5 6-Back-Lusby vs 4-Houston-Weiland
490 0.00 5.00 3N W 6 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
|
| 13 |
♠97532
♥AKT
♦763
♣Q8
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 5 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 4-Houston-Weiland
650 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 5 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
650 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 5 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
650 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 5 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 5-Ash-Finkle
650 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 5 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 1-Rothman-Myers
650 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 5 6-Back-Lusby vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
|
| 14 |
♠K84
♥KQ42
♦Q3
♣QT63
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2/1 ♦2 ♥5/4 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 5.00 0.00 3N N 4 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 1-Rothman-Myers
400 3.50 1.50 3N N 3 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
400 3.50 1.50 3N N 3 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
130 2.00 3.00 3♦ S 4 6-Back-Lusby vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
50 0.50 4.50 3N N -1 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 4-Houston-Weiland
50 0.50 4.50 3N N -1 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 5-Ash-Finkle
|
| 15 |
♠KQJT3
♥A
♦743
♣K762
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥1 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 4♦ 6♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.00 0.00 3♥ W 4 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 5-Ash-Finkle
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ W 5 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
230 3.00 2.00 3♥ W 6 6-Back-Lusby vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
450 2.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 1-Rothman-Myers
480 1.00 4.00 4♥ W 6 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 4-Houston-Weiland
570 0.00 5.00 2♥* W 3 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
|
| 16 |
♠K9532
♥KQJ
♦AK9
♣J3
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 6/5♦ 3/2♥ 6♠ 6/5NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 5.00 0.00 3N N 5 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 5-Ash-Finkle
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 1-Rothman-Myers
450 2.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 6-Back-Lusby vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
200 0.00 5.00 2♠ N 5 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 4-Houston-Weiland
|
| 17 |
♠JT
♥QT63
♦A7654
♣A7
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 2N E -4 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 4-Houston-Weiland
100 4.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Ash-Finkle
50 2.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
50 2.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 6-Back-Lusby vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
100 1.00 4.00 3♣ S -2 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 1-Rothman-Myers
110 0.00 5.00 2♥ E 2 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
|
| 18 |
♠AK84
♥J
♦QJ873
♣Q87
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3/4♦ 3♥ 4/5♠ 3/4NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 6-Back-Lusby vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
630 2.50 2.50 3N N 4 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Ash-Finkle
630 2.50 2.50 3N N 4 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 1-Rothman-Myers
620 1.00 4.00 4♠ N 4 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 4-Houston-Weiland
200 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -2 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
|
| 19 |
♠A5
♥J8
♦K64
♣A98642
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 2♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ W 4 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ W 4 6-Back-Lusby vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Ash-Finkle
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 1-Rothman-Myers
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 4-Houston-Weiland
|
| 20 |
♠J73
♥Q
♦KJ762
♣KQ62
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1/-♠ 4NT ♣5 ♠7/6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 6-Back-Lusby vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
120 4.00 1.00 2N S 2 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Ash-Finkle
100 3.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
110 1.00 4.00 2♠ W 2 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 1-Rothman-Myers
200 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -2 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 4-Houston-Weiland
|
| 21 |
♠A542
♥A85
♦QT7
♣Q94
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2♥ 6♠ ♣4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 5-Ash-Finkle
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 6-Back-Lusby vs 1-Rothman-Myers
620 1.00 4.00 4♠ S 4 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 4-Houston-Weiland
110 0.00 5.00 3♣ E 3 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
|
| 22 |
♠T
♥JT863
♦AJ653
♣82
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 3♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 2N W -2 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
260 4.00 1.00 3♠ E 7 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
650 2.00 3.00 5♠ E 5 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 5-Ash-Finkle
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 6-Back-Lusby vs 1-Rothman-Myers
680 0.00 5.00 4♠ E 6 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 4-Houston-Weiland
|
| 23 |
♠J952
♥KJ
♦T643
♣AQ9
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 |
| EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 5.00 0.00 3N E -3 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 5-Ash-Finkle
200 4.00 1.00 3♣ W -2 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
110 3.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ E 4 6-Back-Lusby vs 1-Rothman-Myers
620 0.50 4.50 4♥ E 4 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 4-Houston-Weiland
620 0.50 4.50 4♥ E 4 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
|
| 24 |
♠Q3
♥KT53
♦A832
♣954
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 1♦ W -3 1-Moeslein-Cohen vs 2-Riggers-Riggers
110 4.00 1.00 2♥ N 2 3-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 6-Crabtree-Ashby
80 3.00 2.00 1♥ N 1 4-Caras-Miller-Minsker vs 3-Baronofsky-Hargest
50 2.00 3.00 1♦ W -1 5-Elliott-Elliott vs 5-Ash-Finkle
110 0.50 4.50 1♠ W 2 2-Banucci-Banucci vs 4-Houston-Weiland
110 0.50 4.50 1♠ W 2 6-Back-Lusby vs 1-Rothman-Myers
|