| 1 |
♠Q3
♥AK8754
♦63
♣J63
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 4♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 6-Bender-Hautem vs 5-Quiros-Salem
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 7-Williams-Scholl vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ N 5 4-Urben-Cecka vs 1-Parks-Quiros
50 1.00 3.00 4♣ E -1 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 2-Carlson-Nair
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ W 4 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 8-Levy-Nelson
|
| 2 |
♠K8762
♥9
♦A983
♣J52
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 8-Levy-Nelson
110 3.00 1.00 2♣ E 3 7-Williams-Scholl vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 3 4-Urben-Cecka vs 1-Parks-Quiros
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ E 4 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 2-Carlson-Nair
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 6-Bender-Hautem vs 5-Quiros-Salem
|
| 3 |
♠JT4
♥J72
♦Q4
♣AQT62
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 5♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 8-Levy-Nelson
120 3.00 1.00 1N W 2 7-Williams-Scholl vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
150 1.50 2.50 1N W 3 6-Bender-Hautem vs 5-Quiros-Salem
150 1.50 2.50 1N W 3 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 2-Carlson-Nair
180 0.00 4.00 1N W 4 4-Urben-Cecka vs 1-Parks-Quiros
|
| 4 |
♠A7
♥AQ842
♦KQ4
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 1-Parks-Quiros vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 5-Quiros-Salem vs 2-Carlson-Nair
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 7-Williams-Scholl vs 6-Bender-Hautem
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ N 4 8-Levy-Nelson vs 4-Urben-Cecka
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ N 4 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
|
| 5 |
♠8752
♥T
♦T8752
♣K84
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.50 0.50 1N S 3 1-Parks-Quiros vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
150 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -3 7-Williams-Scholl vs 6-Bender-Hautem
100 2.00 2.00 2N E -2 8-Levy-Nelson vs 4-Urben-Cecka
100 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
120 0.00 4.00 1N E 2 5-Quiros-Salem vs 2-Carlson-Nair
|
| 6 |
♠AQ6
♥KQ53
♦6
♣AK964
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2/1NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 5-Quiros-Salem vs 2-Carlson-Nair
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 4 7-Williams-Scholl vs 6-Bender-Hautem
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 4 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
120 1.00 3.00 2N N 2 8-Levy-Nelson vs 4-Urben-Cecka
50 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -1 1-Parks-Quiros vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
|
| 7 |
♠6
♥KT95
♦942
♣KQ973
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 2-Carlson-Nair vs 4-Urben-Cecka
150 2.50 1.50 4♦ S 5 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 5-Quiros-Salem
150 2.50 1.50 3♦ S 5 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 1-Parks-Quiros
100 1.00 3.00 5♦ S -1 6-Bender-Hautem vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 8-Levy-Nelson vs 7-Williams-Scholl
|
| 8 |
♠KT9
♥J32
♦J32
♣K632
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT6/5 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ W 3 2-Carlson-Nair vs 4-Urben-Cecka
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ W 3 6-Bender-Hautem vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ W 3 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 5-Quiros-Salem
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ W 3 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 1-Parks-Quiros
150 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -3 8-Levy-Nelson vs 7-Williams-Scholl
|
| 9 |
♠JT7432
♥3
♦AJ8
♣AT8
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
| EW: 3/4♣ 3♦ 4/5♥ 3/1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 6♥* W -1 8-Levy-Nelson vs 7-Williams-Scholl
100 3.00 1.00 4♠* N -1 6-Bender-Hautem vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
300 2.00 2.00 5♠* N -2 2-Carlson-Nair vs 4-Urben-Cecka
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 5 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 5-Quiros-Salem
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 5 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 1-Parks-Quiros
|
| 10 |
♠T82
♥QT543
♦4
♣A984
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♠ 3/4NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 5♠ W -1 1-Parks-Quiros vs 6-Bender-Hautem
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 7-Williams-Scholl vs 4-Urben-Cecka
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 8-Levy-Nelson
200 1.00 3.00 3♦ S -2 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 5-Quiros-Salem
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 2-Carlson-Nair
|
| 11 |
♠AQ76
♥J6
♦JT
♣87654
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 2N E 2 7-Williams-Scholl vs 4-Urben-Cecka
150 3.00 1.00 2N E 3 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 8-Levy-Nelson
400 2.00 2.00 3N E 3 1-Parks-Quiros vs 6-Bender-Hautem
430 0.50 3.50 3N E 4 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 5-Quiros-Salem
430 0.50 3.50 3N E 4 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 2-Carlson-Nair
|
| 12 |
♠AJT3
♥QT852
♦T42
♣5
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♣ W -2 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 2-Carlson-Nair
50 2.50 1.50 1N W -1 1-Parks-Quiros vs 6-Bender-Hautem
50 2.50 1.50 1N W -1 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 5-Quiros-Salem
90 0.50 3.50 2♣ W 2 7-Williams-Scholl vs 4-Urben-Cecka
90 0.50 3.50 2♣ W 2 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 8-Levy-Nelson
|
| 13 |
♠QJ83
♥KJ8
♦K94
♣AQ4
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 6♠ 5NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1430 4.00 0.00 6♠ N 6 2-Carlson-Nair vs 7-Williams-Scholl
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 6 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 5 4-Urben-Cecka vs 6-Bender-Hautem
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 8-Levy-Nelson vs 5-Quiros-Salem
100 0.00 4.00 6♠ N -1 1-Parks-Quiros vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
|
| 14 |
♠T9532
♥8
♦JT32
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -2 8-Levy-Nelson vs 5-Quiros-Salem
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ W -2 2-Carlson-Nair vs 7-Williams-Scholl
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 4-Urben-Cecka vs 6-Bender-Hautem
90 0.00 4.00 1N E 1 1-Parks-Quiros vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
|
| 15 |
♠A6
♥K864
♦64
♣AKJ42
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4/5♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.50 0.50 3N S 4 1-Parks-Quiros vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
630 3.50 0.50 3N S 4 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
600 1.00 3.00 3N S 3 2-Carlson-Nair vs 7-Williams-Scholl
600 1.00 3.00 3N S 3 8-Levy-Nelson vs 5-Quiros-Salem
600 1.00 3.00 5♣ S 5 4-Urben-Cecka vs 6-Bender-Hautem
|
| 16 |
♠T2
♥T75
♦T9873
♣J83
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♥
♣5/3 ♦3 ♥7/6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.50 1.50 2N S 2 2-Carlson-Nair vs 1-Parks-Quiros
120 2.50 1.50 2N S 2 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 8-Levy-Nelson
120 2.50 1.50 2N S 2 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 6-Bender-Hautem
120 2.50 1.50 2N S 2 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 4-Urben-Cecka
100 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 5-Quiros-Salem vs 7-Williams-Scholl
|
| 17 |
♠T63
♥AQ
♦K9876
♣873
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 1♦ 6♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 1N E 3 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 6-Bender-Hautem
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W 4 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 4-Urben-Cecka
480 1.00 3.00 5♥ E 6 5-Quiros-Salem vs 7-Williams-Scholl
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 6 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 8-Levy-Nelson
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 6 2-Carlson-Nair vs 1-Parks-Quiros
|
| 18 |
♠KQT9
♥QJ98
♦72
♣A74
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 4-Urben-Cecka
50 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 8-Levy-Nelson
50 2.50 1.50 2♣ E -1 9-Lieberman-Landau vs 6-Bender-Hautem
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 2-Carlson-Nair vs 1-Parks-Quiros
200 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 5-Quiros-Salem vs 7-Williams-Scholl
|
| 19 |
♠Q954
♥Q8
♦864
♣AT72
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 1-Parks-Quiros vs 7-Williams-Scholl
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 6-Bender-Hautem vs 8-Levy-Nelson
650 2.00 2.00 5♥ E 5 4-Urben-Cecka vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
680 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 6 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 2-Carlson-Nair
680 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 6 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 5-Quiros-Salem
|
| 20 |
♠72
♥J84
♦T8754
♣987
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1NT
♦2 ♥2 ♠3/4 NT3/7 |
| EW: 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 6N W -5 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 2-Carlson-Nair
300 3.00 1.00 6♥ E -3 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 5-Quiros-Salem
200 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -2 1-Parks-Quiros vs 7-Williams-Scholl
100 1.00 3.00 5♦ W -1 4-Urben-Cecka vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
1130 0.00 4.00 3♥* E 5 6-Bender-Hautem vs 8-Levy-Nelson
|
| 21 |
♠AJ654
♥T
♦AK42
♣764
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 7♥ 5♠ 7NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1430 4.00 0.00 6♥ S 6 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 2-Carlson-Nair
710 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 7 6-Bender-Hautem vs 8-Levy-Nelson
690 2.00 2.00 3N N 6 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 5-Quiros-Salem
680 1.00 3.00 5♥ S 6 1-Parks-Quiros vs 7-Williams-Scholl
100 0.00 4.00 6♥ S -1 4-Urben-Cecka vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
|
| 22 |
♠9643
♥2
♦T9873
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4/3 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 2N E -2 2-Carlson-Nair vs 8-Levy-Nelson
200 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -2 4-Urben-Cecka vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 6-Bender-Hautem
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 2 7-Williams-Scholl vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
500 0.00 4.00 3♣* S -3 5-Quiros-Salem vs 1-Parks-Quiros
|
| 23 |
♠KJ874
♥K5
♦Q
♣AJT82
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 2-Carlson-Nair vs 8-Levy-Nelson
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 3 5-Quiros-Salem vs 1-Parks-Quiros
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 4-Urben-Cecka vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
100 1.50 2.50 3♣ S -1 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 6-Bender-Hautem
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 3 7-Williams-Scholl vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
|
| 24 |
♠AK75
♥932
♦4
♣AQT54
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♦ E -1 2-Carlson-Nair vs 8-Levy-Nelson
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 7-Williams-Scholl vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 6-Bender-Hautem
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ W 3 5-Quiros-Salem vs 1-Parks-Quiros
500 0.00 4.00 4♣* N -3 4-Urben-Cecka vs 3-Leavitt-Cohen
|
| 25 |
♠652
♥7632
♦KT2
♣532
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ S -1 5-Quiros-Salem vs 4-Urben-Cecka
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ S -1 8-Levy-Nelson vs 1-Parks-Quiros
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ E 4 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 7-Williams-Scholl
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ W 4 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ W 4 6-Bender-Hautem vs 2-Carlson-Nair
|
| 26 |
♠A5
♥A32
♦Q
♣AKJ8753
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 2♦ 3♥ 6/5NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
950 4.00 0.00 5♣* N 6 6-Bender-Hautem vs 2-Carlson-Nair
170 2.50 1.50 4♣ N 6 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
170 2.50 1.50 3♣ N 6 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 7-Williams-Scholl
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ N 5 8-Levy-Nelson vs 1-Parks-Quiros
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 5-Quiros-Salem vs 4-Urben-Cecka
|
| 27 |
♠K864
♥J93
♦64
♣A842
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 5-Quiros-Salem vs 4-Urben-Cecka
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 3-Leavitt-Cohen vs 9-Lieberman-Landau
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 6-Bender-Hautem vs 2-Carlson-Nair
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 10-Zinn-Weindruch vs 7-Williams-Scholl
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -1 8-Levy-Nelson vs 1-Parks-Quiros
|