1 |
♠T86
♥K432
♦KT43
♣43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♣ E -1 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 1-James-Katzin
|
2 |
♠Q973
♥76
♦J83
♣A987
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1♦ 2NT ♣6/7 ♥6 ♠4/5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 3 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ E 4 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 1-James-Katzin
|
3 |
♠AQJ63
♥AJT
♦J83
♣J6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
150 1.00 1.00 1N S 3 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 1-James-Katzin
|
4 |
♠Q6
♥9763
♦76543
♣Q2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 4♠ 4/-NT ♣5/4 ♦5/2 NT10/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♣ S -1 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
200 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 5 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
650 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 1-James-Katzin
|
5 |
♠AJ962
♥A97654
♦2
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ N 4 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 1-James-Katzin
|
6 |
♠KJT932
♥4
♦K8
♣QJ72
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6/5 |
EW: 2/1♦ 1NT ♣4/3 ♥5 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
100 1.00 1.00 5♣ S -2 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
150 0.00 2.00 2N N -3 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 1-James-Katzin
|
7 |
♠AJT9643
♥Q72
♦Q
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦1 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 1-James-Katzin
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
|
8 |
♠KJ95
♥K32
♦J97
♣K42
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 2 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ W 4 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-James-Katzin
|
9 |
♠J8
♥KQ6543
♦J4
♣K92
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 5 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-James-Katzin
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
|
10 |
♠A986
♥Q85
♦Q2
♣AQ75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 4♦ W 4 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
150 1.00 1.00 4♦ W 5 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-James-Katzin
1070 0.00 2.00 3♦* W 5 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
|
11 |
♠8
♥QJ54
♦Q863
♣Q983
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 5 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 5 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 5 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-James-Katzin
|
12 |
♠A943
♥Q
♦5
♣KQ97542
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 0.00 3N S 3 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-James-Katzin
150 1.00 1.00 3♣ N 5 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
130 0.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
|
13 |
♠KQJ94
♥AQ9
♦72
♣875
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-James-Katzin
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
|
14 |
♠K
♥Q83
♦98754
♣KT62
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2N E 3 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
400 1.00 1.00 3N E 3 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
430 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-James-Katzin
|
15 |
♠KJT74
♥A6
♦K3
♣9842
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4/5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 1.50 0.50 2N W 2 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
120 1.50 0.50 2N W 2 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 1-James-Katzin
|
16 |
♠A
♥T97
♦QT96
♣AT642
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 6♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3/1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ S 5 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ S 5 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
200 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 5 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 1-James-Katzin
|
17 |
♠Q632
♥Q983
♦T43
♣J5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 1♦ S 3 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
90 1.00 1.00 1♦ S 2 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
50 0.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 1-James-Katzin
|
18 |
♠Q83
♥AJT82
♦QJ84
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 1-James-Katzin
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
|
19 |
♠AQT754
♥Q
♦J4
♣KQ96
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2/3 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 1-James-Katzin
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
|
20 |
♠KQJ5
♥732
♦QT86
♣96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ S 3 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 1-James-Katzin
|
21 |
♠K85
♥KJ85
♦-
♣KJ8642
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♥ ♦4/3 ♠6/5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♣ N 6 3-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-Waldman-Schneider
100 1.00 1.00 3♦ E -2 1-Jones-Averkamp vs 2-Brewer-Lusby
300 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -3 2-Schrader-McCabe vs 1-James-Katzin
|