| 1 |
♠KQ76
♥QJ73
♦AK54
♣Q
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ -/1♦ 1/2♥ 2♠ 2/3NT
♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 3-Rissman-Walker vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
50 1.00 1.00 2N E -1 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 1-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 2 |
♠AT7
♥KQ2
♦8763
♣KT3
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4/5NT ♣6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦4/3 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 1-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 3-Rissman-Walker vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
| 3 |
♠86532
♥J6
♦K986
♣86
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.00 0.00 3N S 4 3-Rissman-Walker vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
90 1.00 1.00 2♣ S 2 1-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
50 0.00 2.00 5♦ N -1 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
|
| 4 |
♠T54
♥J76
♦74
♣QJ632
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 3-Rissman-Walker vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
90 1.00 1.00 1N W 1 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 1-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 5 |
♠AJ874
♥J3
♦AQJ86
♣J
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 1♥ 6♠ 4NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 6 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
680 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 6 3-Rissman-Walker vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 1-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 6 |
♠32
♥AJT6
♦7542
♣K96
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 2♣ S 4 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
110 0.50 1.50 2♠ E 2 1-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
110 0.50 1.50 1♠ E 2 3-Rissman-Walker vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
| 7 |
♠Q6
♥A654
♦JT853
♣Q6
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠3 NT4/3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2N E 3 1-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
600 1.00 1.00 3N E 3 3-Rissman-Walker vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
| 8 |
♠KJ83
♥AKT83
♦63
♣KJ
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 3-Rissman-Walker vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 3 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
50 0.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 1-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
|
| 9 |
♠9
♥Q4
♦AJ986
♣KQ984
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣0 ♦1 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
170 1.00 1.00 3♣ N 6 1-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 3-Rissman-Walker vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 10 |
♠K2
♥AKJ85
♦AK6
♣AT9
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 7♦ 4♥ 7♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣3/4 ♦0 ♥1 ♠0 NT1/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 2.00 0.00 3N N 4 3-Rissman-Walker vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 0.00 2.00 5♦ S -1 1-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
|
| 11 |
♠6
♥T98
♦AJ72
♣AKJ42
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ -/1♥
♥6/7 ♠4/5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ -/1NT
♣5 ♦5/6 ♥5/6 NT5/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 3-Rissman-Walker vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
50 1.00 1.00 1N S -1 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 1-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
|
| 12 |
♠6
♥863
♦KQ763
♣JT52
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 4♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.75 0.25 4♠ W -1 3-Rissman-Walker vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
420 0.25 1.75 4♠ W 4 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
| 13 |
♠J974
♥AQ972
♦5
♣853
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 2♥ N -1 1-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 1.50 0.50 2♣ S -1 3-Rissman-Walker vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
150 0.00 2.00 2N W 3 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 14 |
♠A754
♥T732
♦AT5
♣A4
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣6 NT6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S 2 1-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ N 2 3-Rissman-Walker vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
50 0.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 15 |
♠AJ653
♥A42
♦83
♣965
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦4 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ S 5 3-Rissman-Walker vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
100 1.00 1.00 4♦ E -2 1-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
90 0.00 2.00 1N E 1 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 16 |
♠T86
♥AQ87
♦A632
♣72
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣2 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 2NT ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ E 3 3-Rissman-Walker vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
130 1.00 1.00 4♣ E 4 1-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
600 0.00 2.00 5♣ E 5 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 17 |
♠KT54
♥AT9
♦A65
♣J92
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 2♣ W 2 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
100 1.00 1.00 1N* S -1 3-Rissman-Walker vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
120 0.00 2.00 1N W 2 1-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
| 18 |
♠AKQJT54
♥987
♦-
♣KT9
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
720 2.00 0.00 3N S 7 1-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 1.00 1.00 6♠ S -1 2-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
200 0.00 2.00 6♠ S -2 3-Rissman-Walker vs 3-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
|